Original contributionIntraglandular tumor extent and prognosis in prostatic carcinoma: Application of a grid method to prostatectomy specimens
References (49)
- et al.
The ratio of prostate chips with cancer: A new measure of tumor extent and its relationship to grade and prognosis
Hum Pathol
(1988) Prostate cancer and chip specimens: Complete versus partial sampling
Hum Pathol
(1986)- et al.
Carcinoma of the prostate: Biopsy and conservative therapy
J Urol
(1972) - et al.
Early carcinoma of the prostate: Comparison of stages A and B
J Urol
(1976) - et al.
Prostatic adenocarcinoma: Relationship of grade and local extent to the pattern of metastases
J Urol
(1977) - et al.
Bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma confined to the prostate
J Urol
(1984) - et al.
Pathologic factors that influence prognosis in stage A prostatic cancer: The influence of extent versus grade
J Urol
(1981) - et al.
Latent carcinoma of the prostate—why the controversy?
J Urol
(1974) - et al.
Pelvic lymphadenectomy in stage A prostatic cancer
Urology
(1977) - et al.
Predicting the probability of bone metastasis through histologic grading of prostate carcinoma: Retrospective correlative analysis of 81 autopsy cases with antemortem transurethral resection specimens
J Urol
(1983)
Lymphatic spread from prostatic cancer
J Urol
(1959)
Differences in pathological characteristics and prognosis of clinical A2 prostatic cancer from A1 and B disease
J Urol
(1978)
Incidental prostatic carcinoma: Tumor extent versus histologic grade
Urology
(1982)
Prognosis of clinically undiagnosed prostatic carcinoma and the influence of endocrine therapy
J Urol
(1977)
Carcinoma of the prostate gland: A pathologic study
J Urol
(1939)
A study of 48 cases of incidental carcinoma of the prostate followed 10 years or longer
J Urol
(1976)
Patterns of progression in prostate cancer
Lancet
(1986)
Predictors of lymphatic spread in prostatic adenocarcinoma: Uro-oncology Research Group Study
J Urol
(1980)
Cancer of the prostate gland: A clinical and pathological evaluation of patients treated by radical prostatectomy
J Urol
(1961)
Carcinoma of the prostate in elderly men: Incidence, growth characteristics and clinical significance
J Urol
(1969)
Incidental carcinoma of the prostate: A review of the literature and critical reappraisal of classification
J Urol
(1980)
Prognosis of untreated stage A1 prostatic carcinoma in study of 94 cases with extended followup
J Urol
(1986)
The volume and anatomical location of residual tumor in radical prostatectomy specimens removed for stage A1 prostate cancer
J Urol
(1988)
Morphometric measurement of tumor volume and per cent of gland involvement as predictors of pathological stage in clinical stage B prostate cancer
J Urol
(1989)
Cited by (133)
A modified point count method as a practical approach to assess the tumor volume and the percent gland involvement by prostate carcinoma
2014, Pathology Research and PracticeCitation Excerpt :The same criterion could apply to the four or more slices in each region using the entire embedding protocols. Compared with previous recommended protocols, the estimation method of the tumor size described in this study is more practical, generating a procedure that is easy to use by any community-based pathology laboratory and avoiding the use of whole-mounted sections [8], rulers with grid [13], computer-based morphometrics [19] or time consuming drawing on the glass slides or on the paper sheets [3]. After evaluating 447 prostatectomy specimens, Vollmer concluded that the estimation of the percentage of gland involvement by visual inspection would require no more than five minutes.
Open vs. robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon and pathologist comparison of pathologic and oncologic outcomes
2013, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original InvestigationsUpdate on prostate pathology
2012, PathologyPrognostic significance of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy specimens
2011, Journal of Urology
Copyright © 1990 Published by Elsevier Inc.