Original contribution
Computed tomography in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Part I: T-stage conversion with CT-staging

https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(90)90224-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Two hundred seventeen consecutive patients were treated with radiotherapy alone, with curative intent, from 1970 to 1985 at the Radiotherapy Unit of the University and Hospital of Florence. The distribution according to T and N staging with polytomography was compared to patients (106 out of 217) who had CT scans done at presentation. T1 cases were less frequent (6.6% vs 27%) in the Cf-staged series, whereas T3 showed a higher incidence (30.2% vs 12.6%). The advantages of CT over conventional tomography were quantitated in a subset of 97 patients who underwent both staging procedures. Site-by-site, CT displayed a higher percentage of involvement than polytomography: parapharyngeal spread 18% vs 2%, oropharynx 16% vs 8%, choanae and nasal cavities 28% vs 13%, ethmoid and maxillary sinus 29% vs 13%. Information provided by CT caused a T-stage conversion in 23 out of 97 cases (23%): 4 out of 11 T1, 16 out of 44 T2, 3 out of 16 T3.

References (34)

  • G.C. Dooms et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging of the lymph nodes: comparison with CT

    Radiology

    (1984)
  • L.C. Doubleday et al.

    Computed tomography of the infratemporal fossa

    Radiology

    (1981)
  • G. Giannardi et al.

    Diagnostica per immagini

  • M.L. Griem et al.

    Nasopharynx

  • W. Heppt et al.

    Detection and assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in head and neck tumors. A comparison of methods

    Laryngorhinootologie

    (1989)
  • L.A. Hoover et al.

    Differential diagnosis of nasopharyngeal tumors by computed tomography scanning

    Arch. Otolaryngol.

    (1983)
  • M.F. Mafee et al.

    Head and neck: high field magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography

    Otolaryngol. Clin. N. Am.

    (1988)
  • Cited by (25)

    • How Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Influence Staging According to AJCC Staging System for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Compared With Computed Tomography?

      2008, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Magnetic resonance imaging is used widely in both staging and treatment planning for radiotherapy. The improvements in staging accuracy and treatment techniques could affect, not only the ultimate outcome, but also the relative significance of different factors (8). Although Ng et al.(4) and Poon et al.(5) have demonstrated that the T stage changed from 26.9% to 33.3% and N stage changed 6%, the exact role of MRI in improving accuracy with the 6th edition of the AJCC staging system compared with CT has not been well established.

    • Nasopharyngeal Cancer

      2003, Head and Neck Cancer: Emerging Perspectives
    • What is the significance of nasal involvement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma?

      1999, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Department of Radiotherapy.

    Imaging Department.

    View full text