Clinical Studies
What Proportion of Common Diagnostic Tests Appear Redundant?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00063-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose: To identify ancillary tests for which there are criteria defining the earliest interval at which a repeat test might be indicated, to determine how often each test is repeated earlier than these intervals and, if repeated, provides useful information.

Subjects and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 6,007 adults discharged from a large teaching hospital during a 3-month period in 1991. We measured the proportion of commonly performed diagnostic tests that were redundant, and their associated charges.

Results: Of the 6,007 patients discharged, 5,289 (88%) had at least one of 12 target tests performed. Overall, 78,798 of the target tests were performed during the study period, of which 22,237 (28%) were repeated earlier than test-specific predefined intervals. This percentage varied substantially by test (range, 2% to 62%). To assess how many early repeats were justified, we performed chart reviews in a random sample stratified by test. For two tests, nearly all the initial results in the sample were abnormal, and all repeats were considered justified. Of early repeats following a normal initial result for the remaining 10 tests, chart review found no clinical indication for 92%, and a weighted mean of 40% appeared redundant. Overall, 8.6% of these 10 tests appeared redundant; if these were not performed, the annual charge reductions would be $930,000 at our hospital, although the impact on costs would be much smaller.

Conclusions: For some tests, an important proportion are repeated too early to provide useful clinical information. Most such tests might be eliminated using computerized reminder systems.

Section snippets

Patient Population

The study sample included all adults discharged from Brigham and Women’s Hospital, a 726-bed tertiary care hospital, during a 3-month period in 1991.

Test Selection and Definitions

We identified tests that met at least one of two criteria: they were high volume based on data from our hospital’s financial system, or the labor cost or reagent cost of performing the test was high. We then reviewed the literature to identify published guidelines for performing each test. Tests that we initially included because they were either

Results

During a 3-month period in 1991, 6,007 adults were discharged from Brigham and Women’s Hospital (Table 2). Of these patients, 5,289 (88%) had at least one of the 12 target tests performed during their hospitalization. During the study period, 78,798 of the target laboratory tests were performed, of which 22,237 (28%) appeared to be early repeats based on the financial database (Table 3). This proportion was highest for digoxin levels (62%) and chest radiography (58%), and lower for some drug

Discussion

Tests that are repeated too early to provide useful information represent only a small proportion of those that are unnecessary or of marginal yield. However, they represent a group that is easy to target. In this study, we found that 8.6% of a defined group of commonly performed ancillary tests appeared redundant.

There are many reasons that redundant tests are performed. Sometimes nursing or other hospital personnel send more than one sample for a given order (eg, for a urine or sputum

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Anthony Komaroff, MD, for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

References (37)

  • WH Theodore

    Rational use of antiepileptic drug levels

    Ther Drug Monit

    (1992)
  • JW Winkelman

    Less utilization of the clinical laboratory produces disproportionately small true cost reductions

    Hum Pathol

    (1984)
  • JS Spiegel et al.

    Changing physician test ordering in a university hospital. An intervention of physician participation, explicit criteria, and feedback

    Arch Intern Med

    (1989)
  • DM Berwick et al.

    Feedback reduces test use in a health maintenance organization

    JAMA

    (1986)
  • AM Epstein et al.

    Physician characteristics and organizational factors influencing use of ambulatory tests

    Med Decis Making

    (1985)
  • SA Schroeder et al.

    Variation among physicians in use of laboratory tests. Relation to quality of care

    Med Care

    (1974)
  • M Daniels et al.

    Variation among physicians in use of laboratory tests. II. Relation to clinical productivity and outcomes of care

    Med Care

    (1977)
  • PF Griner et al.

    Misuse of laboratory tests and diagnostic procedures

    NEJM

    (1982)
  • SA Schroeder et al.

    Use of laboratory tests and pharmaceuticals. Variation among physicians and effect of cost audit on subsequent use

    JAMA

    (1973)
  • JM Eisenberg et al.

    Computer-based audit to detect and correct overutilization of laboratory tests

    Med Care

    (1977)
  • SV Williams et al.

    A controlled trial to decrease the unnecessary use of diagnostic tests

    J Gen Intern Med

    (1986)
  • RH Dixon et al.

    Ultilization of clinical chemistry services by medical house staff. An analysis

    Arch Intern Med

    (1974)
  • P Axt-Adam et al.

    Influencing behavior of physicians ordering laboratory testsa literature study

    Med Care

    (1993)
  • K Kroenke et al.

    Improving house staff ordering of three common laboratory tests. Reductions in test ordering need not result in underutilization

    Med Care

    (1987)
  • DL Siegel et al.

    Inappropriate testing for diarrheal diseases in the hospital

    JAMA

    (1990)
  • K Kroenke et al.

    The admission urinalysisimpact on patient care

    J Gen Intern Med

    (1986)
  • VA Lawrence et al.

    The unproven utility of preoperative urinalysis. Clinical use

    Arch Intern Med

    (1988)
  • HI Bussey et al.

    A prospective evaluation of therapeutic drug monitoring

    Ther Drug Monit

    (1983)
  • Cited by (116)

    • Evaluation of clinical decision support

      2023, Clinical Decision Support and beyond: Progress and Opportunities in Knowledge-Enhanced Health and Healthcare
    • Inappropriate repeat testing of complete blood count (CBC) and electrolyte panels in inpatients from Alberta, Canada

      2020, Clinical Biochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Between 2004 and 2009, Calgary Laboratory Services (CLS) reported that there was a 36% increase in chemistry test volumes in the Calgary region (unpublished data). Specifically related to inpatient repeated tests, this is a problem that is faced by many jurisdictions and involves a number of laboratory tests that are conventionally ordered as pre- and post-operative evaluations, or simply as standing orders for the length of hospital stay [16–22]. The potential harmful impact of rapid repeat testing on the prognosis of the patient is a major dilemma.

    • Reducing repeat imaging in hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgical cancer care through shared diagnostic imaging repositories

      2019, HPB
      Citation Excerpt :

      This decreased use of repeat imaging resulted in more efficient care with shorter wait times to definitive surgery within the examined population. Repeat imaging rates have been documented between 9 and 40% in prior single-centre reports mostly focussing on a single imaging modality.8,28–30 Detailed data on use of repeat imaging and DIR is sparse.

    • Optimizing Order Entry Automaticity Reduces Inpatient Laboratory Utilization

      2018, American Journal of Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although CDS tools can reduce clinically unnecessary lab testing, when they are set up in an opt-out manner in which an override function is available, the bypass option is often used, limiting their effectiveness. In accordance with other studies,4,9,19,20 our results support the notion that the most successful interventions to the CPOE interface limit ease of ordering (particularly automatically repeating laboratory studies), thus prompting active clinical reassessment by providers to determine order necessity. This is particularly relevant in inpatient settings, where routine daily lab tests account for a significant portion of wasted care in the form of low-cost, high-volume testing.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported in part by grants from the Culpeper Foundation, and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, Maryland (Research Grant R01-HS08927).

    View full text