Elsevier

Human Pathology

Volume 30, Issue 3, March 1999, Pages 257-262
Human Pathology

Original contribution
Interobserver reproducibility of the Lagios nuclear grading system for ductal carcinoma in situ,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(99)90002-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Several studies have shown an association between high nuclear grade or necrosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions and the risk of local disease recurrence in patients with DCIS treated surgically with less than mastectomy. Although criteria for separating low from high nuclear grade lesions have been published, no information exists regarding interobserver reproducibility (IR). To assess IR in the classification of DCIS, six surgical pathologists from four institutions used the Lagios grading system to grade 125 DCIS lesions. Before meeting to evaluate the cases, a training set of 12 glass slides, including cases chosen to present conflicting cues for classification, was mailed to the participants with a written criteria summary. This was followed by a working session in which criteria were reviewed and agreed on. The pathologists then graded the lesions independently. The area of interest was marked on each slide before grading. After initial grading, the pathologists met again to resolve discrepant lesion classifications. A complete agreement among raters was achieved in 43 (35%) cases, with five of six raters agreeing in another 45 (36%) cases. In no case did two raters differ by more than one grade. The pairwise κ agreement values ranged from fair to substantial (0.30 to 0.61). Generalized κ value indicated moderate agreement (0.46, standard error = 0.02). κ statistics for the distinction between grades 1 and 2 and 2 and 3 were 0.29 and 0.48, respectively, (standard error = 0.02). Only one of the six raters differed significantly in scoring. With adherence to specific criteria, IR in the classification of DCIS cases can be obtained in most cases. Although these pathologists made a few grading system modifications, further refinements are needed, especially if grading will influence future therapy.

References (23)

  • L Collins et al.

    Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with excision alone: Predictors of local recurrence

    Mod Pathol

    (1997)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Evaluating agreement, histological features, and relevance of separating pleomorphic and florid lobular carcinoma in situ subtypes

      2018, Human Pathology
      Citation Excerpt :

      All observers in our study are breast specialty trained which may explain overall better agreement. The interobserver agreement (κ value) for PLCIS, noted in our study, is similar to κ values reported for nuclear grading in ductal carcinoma in situ [22]. In our cohort comedo-type necrosis and apoptosis were present in a significantly higher number of slides with consensus for FLCIS.

    • The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ

      2017, European Journal of Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      We will have to wait for outcomes from those clinical trials. While many studies have examined the classification of DCIS by grade-based on a variety of characteristics [5,10,25,25,31–34], this study is the largest and the first to use a sample of pathologists from 8 US states to characterise interpretative agreement for low- and high-grade DCIS. This allowed for a more focussed evaluation demonstrating the specific end of the spectrum of DCIS that suffers from low-diagnostic reproducibility.

    • Practice Guideline for the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In-Situ of the Breast (DCIS)

      2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons
      Citation Excerpt :

      The report also should include the architectural patterns present, since this may have clinical relevance (e.g., the micropapillary pattern may be more prone to multiple quadrant involvement, independent of nuclear grade) [53,54]. A few recent studies have addressed the issue of consistency among pathologists in categorizing DCIS using the newer classification systems [51,56-59]. In general, greatest consistency is achieved using classification systems based primarily on nuclear grade.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute #NOI-CN-65004.

    ☆☆

    Presented in part at the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Boston, MA, March 1998.

    View full text