Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 352, Issue 9131, 12 September 1998, Pages 871-872
The Lancet

Early Report
p53 codon 72 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer in UK

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07357-7Get rights and content

Summary

Background

A polymorphism at codon 72 of the human tumour-suppressor gene, p53, results in translation to either arginine or proline. A recent report suggested that the risk of human-papillomavirus-associated cervical cancer in white women is higher for those homozygous for the arginine allele than for those who are heterozygous. We examined a similar number of cervical cancers and a larger control group for their p53 codon 72 polymorphism status to see if we could confirm this result.

Methods

Three different groups of UK white women were studied: 96 who had volunteered to take part in a trial of ovarian-cancer screening; 150 attending for routine antenatal care in the Oxford region; and 50 women with cervical cancer. DNA from peripheral blood samples and from archival tissue samples was examined by PCR with allele-specific primers.

Findings

The proportions of individuals homozygous for the arginine allele, homozygous for the proline allele, and heterozygous for the two alleles were 59%, 4%, and 36% among women screened for ovarian cancer; 65%, 8%, and 27% among the antenatal-care group; and 54%, 6%, and 40% in women with cervical cancer. X2 analysis showed no significant differences in these proportions.

Interpretation

In the population studied, individuals homozyous for the arginine variant of codon 72 of the p53 gene were not at increased risk of cervical cancer.

Introduction

A candidate marker for risk of cervical cancer risk was described earlier this year.1 Such a marker could be used to direct high-risk women to more frequent cervical screening. The investigators found that a polymorphism at codon 72 of the p53 gene, resulting in the substitution of arginine for proline in the gene product, increased the susceptibility of p53 protein to degradation by E6 protein derived from oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPV). These findings suggest that the two p53 isoforms are functionally different. This theory was examined in a pilot study, which found that the frequency of the arginineencoding allele was significantly higher in normal tissue from 30 women with cervical cancer than in 41 healthy controls; 76% of cervical cancer cases were homozygous for the arginine polymorphism compared with 37% of controls.

To confirm the results of this study, we examined the p53 codon 72 polymorphism genotypes of a larger series of women. Apart from the previously described study,1 there are no reports of the frequency of the arginine allele in any UK population. Because the frequency of the arginine allele varies between ethnic groups,2 the validity of such a study depends on accurate matching of cases and controls.

Section snippets

Participants and samples

Ethics committee approval was obtained for this study. To keep any selection bias to a minimum, the distribution of p53 codon 72 genotypes was examined in two different UK white control populations: 96 women from different parts of the UK who had volunteered to take part in a randomised controlled trial of ovarian-cancer screening and 150 women attending for routine antenatal care in the Oxford region of the UK who were also taking part in a study of the genetics of asthma. 50 white women who

Results

The frequencies of the p53 codon 72 genotypes in the three groups are shown in the figure. There were no significant differences in the proportions of the different p53 codon 72 genotypes between the two control groups (screening group vs antenatal-care group, X2=3·16, df=2, p=0·21), nor between the cervical cancer group and the two control groups combined (controls vs cervical cancer group, X2=1·58, df=2, p=0·45).

Discussion

The previous study1 suggested that a subgroup of women may have a genetic susceptibility to cervical cancer, once infected by oncogenic HPV types. The results of that study suggest that about a third of UK white women would fall into the high-risk category, and therefore that reductions in cost and anxiety might be achieved by reducing the screening frequency in low-risk women. The finding of a germline genetic predisposition to cervical cancer would also have implications for the relatives of

References (5)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text