Original article
Comparative in vitro activity of gemifloxacin to other fluoroquinolones and non-quinolone agents against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis in the United States in 1999–2000

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(01)00431-9Get rights and content

Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess the in vitro activity of gemifloxacin, five other fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents (ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and ofloxacin) and other non-quinolone comparator agents (ampicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, doxycycline, penicillin and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole) against Streptococcus pneumoniae collected in the United States. Susceptibility testing of 550 S. pneumoniae, 290 Haemophilus influenzae and 205 Moraxella catarrhalis showed that 38.2% of pneumococci were penicillin nonsusceptible, while 26.2 and 95.6% of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis, respectively, produced β-lactamase. Overall new fluoroquinolones were the most active agents. The in vitro activity (based on MIC90 in mg/l) of the six fluoroquinolones was gemifloxacin>moxifloxacin>gatifloxacin>levofloxacin>ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin.

Introduction

The majority of bacterial community acquired respiratory tract infections (RTI) are caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis [1], [2]. As a result of increases in resistance of these key respiratory pathogens, physicians have been advised to modify their treatment practices [1], [3], [4]. Recent empirical first-line recommendations include the newer fluoroquinolones, macrolides and doxycycline for community acquired pneumonia (CAP), and amoxycillin, amoxycillin/clavulanate, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime and newer fluoroquinolones for acute bacterial sinusitis [3], [4].

Section snippets

Methods

This study was performed to determine the activity of agents used to treat RTI against contemporary isolates of S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis. A total of 550 S. pneumoniae, 290 H. influenzae and 205 M. catarrhalis were collected from 16 hospitals in the United States (33.8% northeast, 8.7% northwest, 13.5% north central, 12.7% southeast, 14.4% southwest and 16.9% south central). Isolates were recovered from cultures of blood (17.2%), sputum (62.4%), bronchoalveolar lavage

Results

Results of the MICs of non-fluoroquinolones are shown in Table 1 and to quinolone antibiotics in Table 2.

Discussion

This study has shown that the primary RTI pathogens are susceptible to the new quinolones. Agents that were inactive against at least one of the three bacterial species tested included erythromycin, doxycycline and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole.

There were no major changes in susceptibilities of S. pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones compared with 1997 surveillance data [5], [7], [8], [9]. S. pneumoniae susceptibility to erythromycin was similar to that reported for azithromycin in 1997 by Jacobs et

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from GlaxoSmithKline.

References (15)

  • C. Thornsberry et al.

    Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis in the United States in 1996–1997 respiratory season

    Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

    (1997)
  • S.F. Dowell et al.

    Acute otitis media: management and surveillance in an era of pneumococcal resistance—a report from the drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae therapeutic working group

    Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

    (1999)
  • G.L. Drusano et al.

    Relevance of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the selection of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections

    Journal of Chemotherapy

    (1997)
  • J.G. Bartlett et al.

    Practice guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults

    Clinical Infectious Disease

    (2000)
  • Antimicrobial treatment guidelines for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis

    Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery

    (2000)
  • M.R. Jacobs et al.

    Susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae to 10 oral antimicrobial agents based on pharmacodynamic parameters: 1997 U.S. Surveillance Study

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

    (1999)
  • NCCLS. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 2000; M100-S11. NCCLS, Wayne,...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (15)

  • Differential effect of P-gp and MRP2 on cellular translocation of gemifloxacin

    2011, International Journal of Pharmaceutics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Gemifloxacin exhibits a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (Cormican and Jones, 1997; Hohl et al., 1998; Johnson et al., 1999; Oh et al., 1996). The compound showed excellent antimicrobial activity with low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC90) of 0.03, 0.06 and 0.008 μg/ml against Streptococcus pneumoniae, S. pyrogenes and Haemophilus influenzae, respectively (Fuchs et al., 2000; Goldstein et al., 2002; King et al., 2000; Koeth et al., 2002; Rittenhouse et al., 2000). Potent antibacterial activity against clinical isolates and reference strains was observed with gemifloxacin in both in vitro as well as in vivo infectious animal models (Berry et al., 2000; Erwin and Jones, 1999; Johnson et al., 1999; Ramji et al., 2001).

  • Gemifloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia

    2008, Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text