Original article—liver, pancreas, and biliary tract
The Use of Immunoglobulin G4 Immunostaining in Diagnosing Pancreatic and Extrapancreatic Involvement in Autoimmune Pancreatitis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.023Get rights and content

Background & Aims: Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is recognized increasingly as a multisystem disorder. We evaluated the use of immunoglobulin (Ig)G4 immunostaining of pancreatic and extrapancreatic biopsy specimens to make a definitive diagnosis of AIP. Methods: Seventeen biopsy specimens and 3 gallbladder resections were assessed from 11 patients with clinical and radiologic features of AIP. Biopsy specimens from pancreas, liver, colon, stomach, duodenum, bone marrow, salivary gland, and kidney were analyzed morphologically, immunostained for IgG4-positive plasma cells, and compared with controls. Results: Positive IgG4 immunostaining enabled a definitive diagnosis in 10 of 11 (91%) AIP patients. In both pancreatic and extrapancreatic tissues, high levels of IgG4 immunostaining (>10 IgG4-positive plasma cells/high-power field) were found in 17 of 20 (85%) specimens from AIP patients compared with 1 of 175 (0.6%) specimens from controls (P < .05). Positive extrapancreatic IgG4 immunostaining was found in 8 of 11 (73%) patients, including all those with diagnostic features in the pancreas. Increased tissue IgG4 was found irrespective of serum IgG4 level. Conclusions: The finding of IgG4 immunostaining within a range of clinically involved tissues supports the hypothesis that AIP is a multisystem disease. Positive IgG4 immunostaining in extrapancreatic tissues may allow a definitive diagnosis of AIP to be made in those with evidence of pancreatic disease, without the necessity of pancreatic biopsy or surgical exploration. Immunostaining of involved tissue for IgG4 may be particularly useful when AIP is suspected clinically but the serum IgG4 level is normal.

Section snippets

Patients

Eleven consecutive patients (all male) seen in our center between 2004 and 2006 in whom a diagnosis of AIP was made and in whom archival tissue and biopsy specimens obtained at admission to our unit were available for assessment, were included in the study. The diagnosis of AIP was suspected on the basis of clinical and radiologic features4 using published diagnostic criteria for the disease.8 Patient details, the histologic material available for analysis, and the initial histologic diagnoses

Morphologic Appearances of Biopsy Tissue on H and E Sections

Two tissue samples (1 bone marrow trephine from patient 2, and a gastric biopsy specimen from patient 4) were normal morphologically and therefore were not analyzed further.

In 18 of 20 specimens (9 of 11 patients) the original diagnosis made on H&E sections alone was that of an organ-specific chronic inflammatory condition, or nonspecific features (Table 1).

On review of the pancreatic biopsy specimens, characteristic morphologic features of AIP were seen in 3 of 4 (75%). In addition, the

Discussion

AIP is now accepted to be a global disease,6, 25 and not confined to Japan, from where most reports have arisen. As more cases and small series have been published, the involvement of extrapancreatic tissues has been appreciated, and it may be that the pancreas represents just one target of a multisystem disease.5 Although new diagnostic criteria for AIP have placed greater importance on extrapancreatic disease5, 19 than did previous criteria,1 all require pancreatic histology to make a

References (28)

  • N.I. Church et al.

    Autoimmune pancreatitis: response to therapy in a UK series

    Gastroenterology

    (2006)
  • P.S. Japan

    Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis by the Japan Pancreas Society

    J Jpn Pancreas Soc

    (2002)
  • K. Okazaki et al.

    Autoimmune related pancreatitis

    Gut

    (2002)
  • T. Kamisawa et al.

    Extrapancreatic lesions in autoimmune pancreatitis

    J Clin Gastroenterol

    (2005)
  • Cited by (130)

    • The use of immunohistochemistry for IgG4 in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2020, Pancreatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      For those patients, other collateral evidence is needed for an AIP diagnosis. Normal serum IgG4 would not obviate the need for tissue IgG4 immunostaining, because a positive tissue IgG4 immunostaining of a pancreatic and/or extrapancreatic biopsy will occur irrespective of serum IgG4 levels in patients with AIP [6–8]. Moreover, in patients with indeterminate imaging features for AIP, elevated serum IgG4 alone is never sufficient to diagnose type 1 AIP as the ICDC state that two or more lines of strong collateral evidence are needed for cases with indeterminate imaging.

    • Autoimmune pancreatitis – An ongoing challenge

      2020, Advances in Medical Sciences
    • Management of Autoimmune Pancreatitis

      2018, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America
    • Autoimmune Pancreatitis: An Update on Diagnosis and Management

      2016, Gastroenterology Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is too little experience with either EUS-guided or radiology-guided FNA or core biopsies of pancreas to obtain sufficient cytologic or histologic tissue to make a diagnosis (Fig. 5).17,34–36 The additional immunostaining for IgG4 in extrapancreatic tissue may also support the diagnosis of AIP.37 Only after pancreatic malignancy has been ruled out, including a negative EUS-guided FNA, should a diagnostic steroid trial be conducted.7

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text