Chromosome Segregation and Aneuploidy series
Aurora kinases, aneuploidy and cancer, a coincidence or a real link?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2005.03.004Get rights and content

As Aurora kinases are overexpressed in a large number of cancers, and ectopic expression of Aurora generates polyploid cells containing multiple centrosomes, it has been tempting to suggest that Aurora overexpression provokes genetic instability underlying the tumorigenesis. However, examination of the evidence suggests a more complex relationship. Overexpression of Aurora-A readily transforms rat-1 and NIH3T3 cells, but not primary cells, whereas overexpression of Aurora-B induces metastasis after implantation of tumors in nude mice. Why do polyploid cells containing abnormal centrosome numbers induced by Aurora not get eliminated at cell-cycle checkpoints? Does this phenotype determine the origin of cancer or does it only promote tumor progression? Would drugs against aurora family members be of any help for cancer treatment? These and related questions are addressed in this review (which is part of the Chromosome Segregation and Aneuploidy series).

Introduction

The main goal of a mitotic cell is to equally segregate its chromosomes and centrosomes between two daughter cells (Figure 1). As early as 1902, Theodore Boveri predicted that mitotic abnormalities could lead to genetic instability and cancer [1]. Indeed, during mitosis, a spectacular reorganization of the cytoskeleton occurs that builds a bipolar microtubule spindle that assures proper segregation of chromosomes. Mitosis is progressively readied throughout cell-cycle progression: a series of precisely coordinated events must have occurred before the G2–M transition occurs. By the end of S-phase, the cell must have duplicated its centrosome and replicated its DNA. At the end of prophase, the duplicated and matured centrosomes must have become separated. During prometaphase, the two centrosomes and the chromosomes nucleate highly dynamic mitotic microtubules that assemble a bipolar spindle [2]. During progression from prometaphase to metaphase, the chromosomes must become bi-orientated and aligned at the metaphase plate. Bi-orientation is achieved by microtubule-organized attachment of kinetochore pairs to opposite centrosomes. During this process, the mitotic checkpoint is continuously activated; it controls microtubule attachment to the kinetochores and tension. When these two conditions are satisfied, the checkpoint signals are switched off, the chromatids separate and anaphase proceeds. In telophase, nuclear division occurs and the cell undergoes cytokinesis. Finally, each daughter cell receives one set of chromosomes and one centrosome (Box 1).

Considering the complexity of mitosis, it is not surprising that there are many mitotic defects that can lead to the formation of aneuploid daughter cells. An aneuploid cell possesses an altered content of DNA (abnormal number of chromosomes). To give some examples, during mitosis, one can easily imagine at least four ways to obtain an aneuploid cell: (1) incorrect centrosome duplication during interphase that can lead to the formation of multipolar spindles, (2) improper centrosome separation, (3) defective cytokinesis and (4) chromosome mis-orientation (Figure 1).

Progression through mitosis depends on three main regulatory mechanisms: protein localization, proteolysis and phosphorylation. Cdk1 (cyclin-dependent kinase 1 or p34cdc2), Plk1 (Polo-like kinase), Nek2 (NIMA-related kinase 2) and Aurora kinases are the main mitotic protein kinases known to date [3]. Aurora kinases are involved in centrosome separation and maturation, spindle assembly and stability, chromosome condensation, congression and segregation, and cytokinesis [4]. In mammalian cells, three aurora kinases have been identified, named Aurora-A, -B and -C [3]. They possess a very conserved catalytic domain and an N-terminal domain that varies in sequence and in length 5, 6. It is thought that the different Aurora kinases localize differentially and might perform different functions during mitosis. However, all three human kinases are overexpressed in many types of cancers, in which polyploid cells containing multiple centrosomes are observed. This review discusses how overexpression of aurora kinases provokes the development of such a phenotype, and whether this phenotype is key to oncogenesis. Although many studies of Aurora kinases in organisms such as yeasts, Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans and Xenopus have greatly contributed to our understanding of the functions of the kinases, we will only use here the nomenclature Aurora-A, -B and -C and the names of mammalian proteins whenever possible.

Section snippets

Aurora-A: a non residential centrosome kinase

Aurora-A kinase localizes on duplicated centrosomes from the end of S phase to the beginning of the following G1 phase 6, 7. The kinase is then degraded by the proteasome in a Cdh1-dependent manner 8, 9. During mitosis, the protein also localizes to the poles of the mitotic spindle (Box 1). Although these localizations are most commonly observed, it seems that the centrosomal Aurora-A kinase exchanges rapidly with an apparently large cytoplasmic pool of Aurora-A [10].

The catalytic activity of

Aurora-B: the chromosome passenger kinase

The Aurora-B kinase belongs to the chromosome passenger protein family (Box 1). Such proteins localize to the kinetochores from prophase to metaphase and to the central spindle and the midbody in cytokinesis [6]. Association of Aurora-B with the inner centromere protein INCENP led to the conclusion that Aurora-B participates in a ‘chromosome passenger complex’ 27, 28. In human cells, INCENP is required to localize Aurora-B at the kinetochores [27]. And, just like Aurora-A, Aurora-B activation

Aurora-C: only a male meiotic kinase or another chromosome passenger protein?

The gene encoding Aurora-C was first isolated from a testis cDNA library and the gene localized to Chr19q13 [54]. Northern blot analyses of Aurora-C then confirmed that the kinase was indeed only detectable in testis 55, 56. During spermatogenesis, high expression of Aurora-C mRNA was detected mainly in pachytene spermatocytes, concomitant with meiotic spindle formation [57]. Although the protein level was not measured, the data suggested that Aurora-C might be involved in meiotic spindle

Surviving without Aurora kinase

Cells usually do not tolerate a lack of Aurora kinase. In the absence of Aurora-A, centrosomes fail to assemble bipolar spindles, inducing the formation of several abnormal mitotic spindles such as spindles with short astral microtubules, monopolar spindles (one pole), monoastral bipolar spindles (bipolar, but with one pole lacking a centrosome), bipolar spindles with multiple centrosomes at the poles, and multipolar spindles (Box 2) 11, 60. A decrease in Aurora-A protein level induced by RNA

To be or not to be an oncogene – that is the question

The protein encoded by the Aurora-A gene was first named BTAK for ‘breast tumor activated kinase’ because its gene, located at 20q13, was found amplified and its mRNA overexpressed in breast tumors. The presence of the amplicon 20q13 in breast tumors is an indicator of poor prognosis [71]. But a breakthrough came from two different groups that demonstrated that ectopic overexpression of Aurora-A was sufficient to transform NIH3T3 and rat1 cells and that transformed cells induced tumors when

Which one of the aurora kinases is the best anti-cancer therapeutic target?

It has been established that, first, overexpression of Aurora-A can transform cells carrying genetic defects and, second, that Aurora-B overexpression induces tumor metastasis. In both cases, the catalytic activity of the kinase is required. So would it be a good idea to develop inhibitors of Aurora as chemotherapeutic drugs? It is always difficult to answer such questions when the functions of the kinases are not yet fully understood. But usually one takes a chance – and indeed a breakthrough

Concluding remarks

The similarities and differences between the three Aurora kinases seem to fit with the proposed evolutionary origin of the kinases [88]. Aurora kinases evolved from a common chordate ancestor, then two Aurora kinases appeared in cold-blooded vertebrates: a true Aurora-A kinase and an Aurora-B/C ancestor. In mammals, the Aurora-B/C ancestor gave rise to two closely related kinases – Aurora-B and Aurora-C. It is not surprising that these last two kinases colocalize (to kinetochore and midbody)

Acknowledgements

I express my apologies to all the authors who have published work related to this review but have not been cited here owing to space constraints. Research in the Claude Prigent laboratory is financed by the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (équipe labellisée) and by the CNRS. Clotilde Petretti is a fellow of the region Bretagne.

References (89)

  • Q. Liu

    Aurora-A Abrogation of p53 DNA binding and transactivation activity by phosphorylation of serine 215

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • M. Ouchi

    BRCA1 phosphorylation by Aurora-A in the regulation of G2 to M transition

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • R.R. Adams

    INCENP binds the Aurora-related kinase AIRK2 and is required to target it to chromosomes, the central spindle and cleavage furrow

    Curr. Biol.

    (2000)
  • S. Kaitna

    Incenp and an aurora-like kinase form a complex essential for chromosome segregation and efficient completion of cytokinesis

    Curr. Biol.

    (2000)
  • J.D. Bishop et al.

    Phosphorylation of the carboxyl terminus of inner centromere protein (INCENP) by the Aurora B Kinase stimulates Aurora B kinase activity

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • Y. Yasui

    Autophosphorylation of a newly identified site of Aurora-B is indispensable for cytokinesis

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • S.C. Sampath

    The chromosomal passenger complex is required for chromatin-induced microtubule stabilization and spindle assembly

    Cell

    (2004)
  • E.K. Speliotes

    The survivin-like C. elegans BIR-1 protein acts with the Aurora-like kinase AIR-2 to affect chromosomes and the spindle midzone

    Mol. Cell

    (2000)
  • J. Chen

    Survivin enhances Aurora-B kinase activity and localizes Aurora-B in human cells

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • S.P. Wheatley

    Aurora-B phosphorylation in vitro identifies a residue of survivin that is essential for its localization and binding to inner centromere protein (INCENP) in vivo

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • J.Y. Hsu

    Mitotic phosphorylation of histone H3 is governed by Ipl1/aurora kinase and Glc7/PP1 phosphatase in budding yeast and nematodes

    Cell

    (2000)
  • Y. Wei

    Phosphorylation of histone H3 is required for proper chromosome condensation and segregation

    Cell

    (1999)
  • J. Petersen et al.

    S. pombe aurora kinase/survivin is required for chromosome condensation and the spindle checkpoint attachment response

    Curr. Biol.

    (2003)
  • W. Lan

    Aurora B phosphorylates centromeric MCAK and regulates its localization and microtubule depolymerization activity

    Curr. Biol.

    (2004)
  • P.D. Andrews

    Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere

    Dev. Cell

    (2004)
  • S. Trautmann

    The S. pombe Cdc14-like phosphatase Clp1p regulates chromosome biorientation and interacts with Aurora kinase

    Dev. Cell

    (2004)
  • H. Goto

    Aurora-B regulates the cleavage furrow-specific vimentin phosphorylation in the cytokinetic process

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • K. Hirose

    MgcRacGAP is involved in cytokinesis through associating with mitotic spindle and midbody

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • Y. Minoshima

    Phosphorylation by aurora B converts MgcRacGAP to a RhoGAP during cytokinesis

    Dev. Cell

    (2003)
  • M. Bernard

    Cloning of STK13, a third human protein kinase related to Drosophila aurora and budding yeast Ipl1 that maps on chromosome 19q13.3-ter

    Genomics

    (1998)
  • X. Li

    Direct association with inner centromere protein (INCENP) activates the novel chromosomal passenger protein, Aurora-C

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • S. Anand

    AURORA-A amplification overrides the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint, inducing resistance to Taxol

    Cancer Cell

    (2003)
  • T. Boveri

    Über mehrpolige Mitosen als Mittel zur Analyse des Zellkerns. Verhandlungen der physicalisch-medizinischen Gesselschaft zu Würzburg

    Neu Folge

    (1902)
  • E.A. Nigg

    Mitotic kinases as regulators of cell division and its checkpoints

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2001)
  • R. Giet et al.

    Aurora/Ipl1p-related kinases, a new oncogenic family of mitotic serine-threonine kinases

    J. Cell Sci.

    (1999)
  • M. Carmena et al.

    The cellular geography of aurora kinases

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2003)
  • A. Castro

    APC/Fizzy-Related targets Aurora-A kinase for proteolysis

    EMBO Rep.

    (2002)
  • R. Giet

    Drosophila Aurora A kinase is required to localize D-TACC to centrosomes and to regulate astral microtubules

    J. Cell Biol.

    (2002)
  • E. Hannak

    Aurora-A kinase is required for centrosome maturation in Caenorhabditis elegans

    J. Cell Biol.

    (2001)
  • Y. Terada

    Interaction of Aurora-A and centrosomin at the microtubule-nucleating site in Drosophila and mammalian cells

    J. Cell Biol.

    (2003)
  • M.Y. Tsai

    A Ran signalling pathway mediated by the mitotic kinase Aurora A in spindle assembly

    Nat. Cell Biol.

    (2003)
  • T.A. Kufer

    Human TPX2 is required for targeting Aurora-A kinase to the spindle

    J. Cell Biol.

    (2002)
  • S. Dutertre

    Phosphorylation of CDC25B by Aurora-A at the centrosome contributes to the G2-M transition

    J. Cell Sci.

    (2004)
  • H. Katayama

    Phosphorylation by aurora kinase A induces Mdm2-mediated destabilization and inhibition of p53

    Nat. Genet.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text