Elsevier

Human Pathology

Volume 33, Issue 3, March 2002, Pages 316-321
Human Pathology

Original Contributions
Biological and clinical significance of cytogenetic abnormalities in low-risk and high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors*

https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2002.32216Get rights and content

Abstract

We report cytogenetic findings in 19 c-Kit–positive gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) that represent a heterogenous group of mesenchymal neoplasms with respect to site, histology, and biologic behavior. All of the GISTs (5 low-risk, 11 high-risk, 3 recurrences) displayed clonal chromosomal aberrations; 15 were hypo- to near-diploid, and 4 were near-triploid and hypotetraploid. The most common abnormalities were loss of chromosomes 14 and/or 22, demonstrated in 14 GISTs irrespective of site or predominant phenotype. Ten cases (2 low-risk, 5 high-risk, 3 recurrences) were characterized by loss of both chromosomes 14 and 22, 2 cases (1 low-risk, 1 high- risk), by loss of chromosome 14; and 2 high-risk cases, by loss of chromosome 22. Additional chromosomal aberrations occurred preferentially in high-risk and recurrent GISTs, including loss of 9p and 1p in 8 cases each, loss of 15 in 6 cases, loss of 3p in 5 cases, loss of 13q and 10q in 4 cases each, loss of 19 in 3 cases, and complete or partial gains of chromosomes 5 and 4 in 2 cases each. More significantly, 5 of 6 patients with clinically aggressive GISTs, including 2 recurrences and 3 metastasing GISTs, were additionally characterized by loss of 9p; four of these had additional loss of chromosomes 1p and 15. The presented results herein indicate that loss of chromosome 14 and/or 22 is an early change in GIST tumorigenesis irrespective of site or differentiation, whereas malignant transformation and progression of GISTs appear to be associated with an increasing incidence of additional secondary aberrations. HUM PATHOL 33:316-321. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

For routine histomorphologic analysis, 19 GISTs were sampled and processed for histomorphologic examination according to standard procedures. Descriptive histomorphologic criteria included cell shape, cellular arrangement, cellularity, and degree of nuclear pleomorphism. Primary GISTs were classified as low- or high-risk tumors for their estimated potential for aggressive clinical behavior as suggested by Franquemont.6 Immunohistochemical analysis was performed, applying a panel of antibodies

Results

The clinicopathological data of 19 patients with GIST, including 16 primary tumors and 3 local recurrences, are summarized in Table 1.Thirteen GISTs were located in the wall of the stomach (cases 1 through 12 and 17), 1 GIST was in the duodenum (case 15), and 1 in the rectum (case 13), and 4 (cases 14, 16, 18, and 19) were intra-abdominal tumors. The patient age at the time of diagnosis ranged from 39 to 81 years (median age 62.6 years). Clinical symptoms included abdominal pain,

Discussion

On the basis of a series of 19 clinically and morphologically characterized GISTs, the possible value of chromosomal aberrations as genetic markers of tumor progression and tumor behavior were investigated. Existing cytogenetic literature regarding c-Kit (CD117)-positive GISTs is limited.2, 7, 9 Review of our data and the results of these earlier studies indicate that certain chromosomal aberrations are common to GISTs irrespective of site, differentiation and benign or malignant behavior.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (86)

  • Loss of SFRP1 expression is a key progression event in gastrointestinal stromal tumor pathogenesis

    2021, Human Pathology
    Citation Excerpt :

    When microGISTs do occasionally succeed in progression to larger clinical GISTs, the clonal evolution results from accumulation of cytogenetic abnormalities in distinct profiles. The early changes usually include monosomy 14, monosomy 22, and 1p deletion [7–10]. This is accompanied by MYC-associated factor X (MAX) gene inactivating mutation [5] followed by 9p deletion, targeting the tumor suppressor gene CDKN2A, which encodes p16 and p14 proteins, and which appears to be a crucial factor in GIST progression [8–11].

  • Personalized medicine in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

    2018, Oncogenomics: From Basic Research to Precision Medicine
  • Chromosomal aberrations in primary PDGFRA-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors

    2014, Human Pathology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The lower rate of these changes in PDGFRA- compared with KIT-mutated GISTs reflects the overall nonaggressive behavior of the tumors in our study. We also repeatedly found an association between −9p, which harbors CDKN2A/2B encoding for 3 tumor suppressor genes, and malignant behavior in GISTs [17,20,22,23,29]. Regarding PDGFRA-mutated GISTs, we here detected a statistically significant association of −9p and of −22q with intermediate/high-risk tumors, which generally correlated with our previous findings in GISTs [17,20,23,29].

View all citing articles on Scopus
*

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Bastian Gunawan, MD, Department of Pathology, Georg-August-University Hospital, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany.

View full text