Skip to main content
Log in

Nodal staging of colorectal carcinomas from quantitative and qualitative aspects. Can lymphatic mapping help staging?

  • Article
  • Published:
Pathology & Oncology Research

Abstract

Retrospective data analysis was performed to determine the minimum number of lymph nodes required for the staging of colorectal carcinomas, and a prospective feasibility study was carried out to identify sentinel nodes in order to clarify whether these may predict the nodal status. From among 240 colorectal carcinoma specimens investigated between 1996 and 1998, 224 tumors were analyzed for their nodal status. Lymphatic mapping with vital patent blue dye injection into the peritumoral subserosal layer was performed in 25 patients. Blue nodes were identified by the pathologist in the unfixed specimen immediately after the resection of the bowel and were assessed separately. Of the 123 node-positive carcinomas, 40 had more than 3 nodes involved. The nodal positivity increased substantially when more than 6 nodes were assessed. The cumulative percentage analysis demonstrated that ideally 16 and 13 nodes should be obtained for the identification of any nodal involvement or the involvement of more than 3 nodes, respectively. Lymphatic mapping was successful in 24 patients (96%). Blue nodes were predictive of the nodal status in 19 cases (79%), and were the only sites of metastasis in 2 patients (15% of the node-positive cases). Lymphatic mapping with the vital blue dye technique does not seem to facilitate the staging of colorectal cancers, at least in our patient population with relatively large and deeply infiltrating tumors, and unless the technique is improved or other selective features of lymph nodes are found, all lymph nodes should be assessed. A minimum of 6 nodes, and an optimum of 16 nodes or more, are suggested from these series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AJCC:

American Joint Committee on Cancer

CRC:

Colorectal cancer

SLN:

Sentinel lymph node

UICC:

Union Internationale Contre le Cancer

References

  1. American Joint Committee on Cancer: Colon and rectum. In: AJCC cancer staging manual, 5th edition. (Eds: Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE et al), Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia-New York, 1997, pp. 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Astler VR, Coller FA: The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 139:846–851, 1954.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bilchik AJ, Giuliano AE, Essner R, et al: Universal application of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy in solid neoplasms. Cancer J Sci Am 4:351–358, 1998.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Borgstein PJ, Pijpers R, Comans EF, et al: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. J Am Coll Surg 186:275–283, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cabanas RM: An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer 39:456–466, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Caplin S, Cerottini J-P, Bosman FT, et al: For patients with Dukes’B (TNM stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer 83:666–672, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cox CE, Pendas S, Cox JM, et al: Guidelines for sentinel node biopsy and lymphatic mapping of patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg 227:645–653, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cserni G: Changing trends in lymph node recovery from axillary clearance specimens in breast cancer: possible implications for the quantitative axillary status from a 17 year retrospective study. Eur J Oncol 2:403–408, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cserni G: Lymph node harvest reporting in patients with carcinoma of the large bowel. A French population-based study. Letter. Cancer 85:243–244, 1999.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dukes CE: The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol Bacteriol 35:323–332, 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fielding LP, Arsenault PA, Chapuis PH, et al: Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT). J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:325–344, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabriel WB, Dukes C, Bussey HJR: Lymphatic spread in cancer of the rectum. Br J Surg 23:395–413, 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giuliano AE, Dale PS, Turner RR, et al: Improved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 180:700–704, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, et al: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 220:391–398, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M, et al: Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol 106:209–216, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hermanek P, Giedl J, Dworak O: Two programmes for examination of regional lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma with regard to the new pN classification. Path Res Pract 185:867–873, 1989.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jass JR: Prognostic factors in rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 31A:862–863, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Joosten JJA, Stobbe LJA, Wauters CAP, et al: Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and the sentinel node concept in colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 86:482–486, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kelemen PR, Van Herle AJ, Giuliano AE: Sentinel lympadenectomy in thyroid malignant neoplasms. Arch Surg 133:288–292, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, et al: Surgical resection and radiolocalization of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 2:335–340, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Levenback C, Burke TW, Gershenson DM, et al: Intraoperative lymphatic mapping for vulvar cancer. Obstet Gynecol 84:163–167, 1994.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mainprize KS, Hewavisinthe J, Savage A, et al: How many lymph nodes to stage colorectal carcinomas? J Clin Pathol 51:165–166, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Maurel J, Launoy G, Grosclaude P, et al: Lymph node harvest reporting in patients with carcinoma of the large bowel. A French population-based study. Cancer 82:1482–1486, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong J, et al: Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg 127:392–399, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Öberg A, Stenling R, Tavelin B, et al: Are lymph node micrometastases of any clinical significance in Dukes stages A and B colorectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 41:1244–1249, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. O’hea BJ, Hill AD, El-Shirbiny AM, et al: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. J Am Coll Surg 186:423–427, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Reuhl T, Kaisers H, Markwardt J, et al: Axillaausraumung bei klinisch nodal-negativen Mammakarzinom. Kann die Indikation durch„sentinel node“-Nachweis individualisiert werden? Dtsch Med Wochenschr 123:583–587, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Scott KWM, Grace RH: Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearance. Br J Surg 76:1165–1167, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Veronesi U, Zurrida S, Galimberti V. Consequences of sentinel node in clinical decision making in breast cancer and prospects for future studies. Eur J Surg Oncol 24:93–95, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wolmark N, Fisher ER, Wieand HS, Fisher B and contributing NSABP investigators: The relationship of depth of penetration and tumor size to the number of positive nodes in Dukes C colorectal cancer. Cancer 53:2707–2712, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gábor Cserni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cserni, G., Vajda, K., TarjÁn, M. et al. Nodal staging of colorectal carcinomas from quantitative and qualitative aspects. Can lymphatic mapping help staging?. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 5, 291–296 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1053/paor.1999.0205

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/paor.1999.0205

Keywords

Navigation