Elsevier

Pathology

Volume 36, Issue 5, October 2004, Pages 428-434
Pathology

The approach to the patient with a difficult melanocytic lesion

https://doi.org/10.1080/00313020412331283905Get rights and content

Summary

Although most histological diagnoses are made with relative ease and with great specificity and reproducibility, there is a subset of cases in which a specific and reproducible diagnosis is difficult or even impossible to render. In the melanocytic system, these cases can be divided into two broad categories. The first category, 'superficial atypical melanocytic proliferations of uncertain significance' (SAMPUS), includes predominantly junctional melanocytic proliferations, and melanocytic proliferations that are confined to the epidermis and papillary dermis, without evidence of tumorigenic proliferation or mitotic activity there. The prognosis for cure of these lesions is excellent if they are completely excised. Such lesions may include, for example, dysplastic naevi, Spitz naevi or pigmented spindle cell naevi with a few atypical melanocytes above the dermalepidermal junction, or with greater than average cytological atypia, or with mitoses, where the differential diagnosis of melanoma in situ is difficult or impossible to rule out. The other category, 'melanocytic tumours of uncertain malignant potential' (MELTUMP), is comprised of melanocytic proliferations that form tumours in the dermis, and are therefore potentially capable of metastasis. Examples of such lesions may include atypical Spitz naevi, deep penetrating naevi, possible naevoid melanomas, or cellular blue naevi, where because of increased mitotic activity or cytologic atypia, a diagnosis of invasive or tumorigenic melanoma cannot be ruled out. In managing such lesions, we follow two main principles. The first is to manage each lesion with therapy designed to be adequate for management of the most significant consideration in the differential diagnosis. The second principle is to make clinicians and patients specifically aware of the diagnostic difficulty in their lesion, so that management can be undertaken on a true informed consent basis.

References (48)

  • BastianB.C.

    Molecular cytogenetics as a diagnostic tool for typing melanocytic tumors

    Recent Results Cancer Res

    (2002)
  • BrennerH.

    How independent are multiple 'independent' diagnostic classifications?

    Stat Med

    (2004)
  • CerroniL. et al.

    Tutorial on melanocytic lesions

    Am J Dermatopathol

    (2001)
  • LeeA.H. et al.

    Excision biopsy findings of patients with breast needle core biopsies reported as suspicious of malignancy (B4) or lesion of uncertain malignant potential (B3)

    Histopathology

    (2003)
  • MooreS.W. et al.

    The epidemiology of neonatal tumours. Report of an international working group

    Pediatr Surg Int

    (2003)
  • FolpeA.L. et al.

    Atypical and malignant glomus tumors: analysis of 52 cases, with a proposal for the reclassification of glomus tumors

    Am J Surg Pathol

    (2001)
  • Medina PerezM. et al.

    Atypical stromal hyperplasia of the prostate (stromal proliferation of uncertain malignant potential). (Spanish.)

    Arch Esp Urol

    (2000)
  • NucciM.R. et al.

    Mucinous endometrial epithelial proliferations: a morphologic spectrum of changes with diverse clinical significance

    Mod Pathol

    (1999)
  • LinB.T. et al.

    Oncocytic adrenocortical neoplasms: a report of seven cases and review of the literature

    Am J Surg Pathol

    (1998)
  • MenakerG.M. et al.

    Granular cell tumor of uncertain malignant potential

    Ann Plast Surg

    (1997)
  • SoumakisS. et al.

    Quantitative pathology in uterine smooth muscle tumours: the case for the standard histologic classification criteria

    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol

    (1997)
  • CarrN.J. et al.

    Unusual tumors of the appendix and pseudomyxoma peritonei

    Semin Diagn Pathol

    (1996)
  • FoucarE.

    Debating melanocytic tumors of the skin: does an 'uncertain' diagnosis signify borderline diagnostic skill? (Letter.)

    Am J Dermatopathol

    (1995)
  • SackettD.L. et al.

    Early diagnosis

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text