Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Quality control in cervical cytology
  1. O. A. N. Husain,
  2. E. Blanche Butler,
  3. D. M. D. Evans1,
  4. J. Elizabeth Macgregor,
  5. R. Yule
  1. St Stephen's and Charing Cross Hospitals, London
  2. St Mary's Hospital, Manchester
  3. St David's Hospital, Cardiff
  4. University of Aberdeen, Manchester
  5. Christie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute, Manchester


    From surveys conducted by the authors it is concluded that the best and most acceptable quality control methods in cytology are those from within the laboratory. Most of these have results which can be reported centrally. Where the overall control and codes of practice are high, there the results are the most reliable, as sources of error from whatever cause are quickly brought to light. These conclusions are illustrated by data from the five centres and correlated in the tables.

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


    • 1 This is a compilation of data from a lecture given to the Royal College of Pathologists on 2 May 1973 by O.A.N.H. and a symposium on quality control given at the British Society for Clinical Cytology meeting on 28 September 1973 in the Hammersmith Hospital by all authors. A paper by Evans et al presented elsewhere in this journal was embodied in the symposium.