For the past five years, it has been our great pleasure to serve as the editorial team of the Journal of Clinical Pathology. We have been fortunate to be able to implement several changes to the journal, and have kept our readership aware of these by means of several editorials.1–8 Now that our term of office is coming to an end, we would like to review the developments of the journal during the past five years, and try to look into the future, especially with regard to electronic publishing.
Changes in the world of electronic publishing happen quickly and we have tried to keep abreast of them. JCP has been fully on line with full access to papers for several years now,1 and in view of the many “hits”our website gets this is quite a success. Access has been made free to the developing countries2 to stimulate research and progress in the diagnostic field. The last big change has been the implementation of a fully internet based electronic submission system called Bench>Press.7 This has speeded up the reviewing process dramatically, and has resulted in a much faster editorial turnaround time. It has also facilitated the submission of papers to JCP from remote areas of the world, which is in line with the journal’s international scope. The journal, together with the other journals in the BMJ Publishing Group, has undergone a major change in layout, which makes it easier to read. We have also introduced several new sections, such as Historical Fillers,9–11 Grand Round Presentations,12 Best Practice Papers,13–24 and ECHOES. The latest addition to this arsenal is the Diagnostic Brief. These are one page articles containing diagnostic algorithms of important practical value, which we assume many professionals will copy to put on a pile beside the microscope. The first one on the immunohistochemical classification of T and NK cell neoplasms is published in this issue.25 Although such Diagnostic Briefs may especially suit histopathologists, the series will also cover microbiology, chemical pathology, immunology, and haematology. Although Diagnostic Briefs will in principle be commissioned, JCP also welcomes spontaneous submissions.
Our continuous professional development (CPD) programme, Pathology Interactive, which was introduced on CD-ROM in 1999,4,26,27 is now also available on line (http://cpd.bmjjournals.com/). When browsing the JCP website, CPD questions related to JCP papers can now be directly accessed by clicking a link.28–39 For the time being, there is a free trial period, so just go there and see if you like it! Especially for our colleagues in small clinical practices who find it difficult to get away, this provides a good means of gathering CDP points recognised by the Royal College of Pathologists.
So, does electronic publishing have virtues only? Well, it certainly looks like that, but there has been a price to pay. Several of our traditional reviewers prefer to review on paper and not online. This has resulted in quite a loss for our reviewers’ database. All editors have been working hard to find new reviewers who are comfortable with reviewing online, but we encourage all those who feel qualified and have not yet been approached to register as a reviewer at www.submit-jcp.bmjjournals.com/. A final question may be whether JCP will exist in the future only electronically, without a paper version. This seems for now a bridge too far to cross. Anyway, it is not a question that we will answer, but leave to our successors. We have been happy to serve you for the past five years, but now it is time to say goodbye. We wish the next editorial team that will be active from 1 January 2003 all the best with taking JCP through the next steps.
REFERENCES
- ↵
- ↵
-
Holzel H, van Diest PJ. The new millennium: time for a change [editorial]! J Clin Pathol2000;53:1–2.
- ↵
Holzel H, van Diest PJ, Heard S. Continuing professional development: is the future Pathology Interactive [editorial]? J Clin Pathol1999;52:401–2.
-
Holzel H, van Diest PJ. The new millennium: time for a change [editorial]! J Clin Pathol2000;53:1–2.
-
Holzel H. Grand Round Presentation [editorial]. J Clin Pathol2002;55:487.
- ↵
Holzel H, van Diest PJ. Journal of Clinical Pathology on the move [editorial]. J Clin Pathol2002;55:161.
- ↵
van Diest PJ, Holzel H, Burnett D, et al. Impactitis: new cures for an old disease [editorial]. J Clin Pathol2001;54:817–19.
- ↵
van de Goot FRW, Ten Berge RL. Lamashtu, “she who erases”, touched her stomach seven times to kill the child. J Clin Pathol2002;55:534.
-
Ten Berge RL, Van de Goot FRW. Seqenenre Taa II, the violent death of a pharaoh. J Clin Pathol2002;55:232.
- ↵
van de Goot FRW, Ten Berge RL. A demon in the bathroom. J Clin Pathol2001;54:876.
- ↵
Hartland A J, Giles PD, J E Bridger JE, et al. A case of membranous glomerulonephritis presenting as pulmonary embolism and acute hyperlipidaemia. J Clin Pathol2002;55:538–40.
- ↵
Graham JC, Galloway A. ACP Best Practice No 167. The laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infection. J Clin Pathol2001;54:911–19.
-
Cruickshank AM. ACP Best Practice No 166. CSF spectrophotometry in the diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Clin Pathol2001;54:827–30.
-
Deacon AC, Elder GH. ACP Best Practice No 165. Front line tests for the investigation of suspected porphyria. J Clin Pathol2001;54:500–7.
-
Parsons MA, Start RD. ACP Best Practice No 164. Necropsy techniques in ophthalmic pathology. J Clin Pathol2001;54:417–27.
-
Gaffney D, Fell GS, O’Reilly DS. ACP Best Practice No 163. Wilson’s disease: acute and presymptomatic laboratory diagnosis and monitoring. J Clin Pathol2000;53:807–12.
-
Calonje E. ACP Best Practice No 162. The histological reporting of melanoma. J Clin Pathol2000;53:587–90.
-
Gibbs AR, Attanoos RL. ACP Best Practice No 161. Examination of lung specimens. J Clin Pathol2000;53:507–12.
-
Furness PN. ACP Best Practice No 160. Renal biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol2000;53:433–8.
-
Burroughs SH, Williams GT. ACP Best Practice No 159. Examination of large intestine resection specimens. J Clin Pathol2000;53:344–9.
-
Helliwell TR. ACP Best Practice No 157. Guidelines for the laboratory handling of laryngectomy specimens. J Clin Pathol2000;53:171–6.
-
Timperley WR. ACP Best Practice No 158. Neuropathology. J Clin Pathol2000;53:255–65.
- ↵
Ibrahim NB. ACP. Best Practice No 155. Guidelines for handling oesophageal biopsies and resection specimens and their reporting. J Clin Pathol2000;53:89–94.
- ↵
Oudejans JJ, Van der Valk P. Diagnostic Brief. Immunohistochemical classification of T and NK cell neoplasms. J Clin Pathol2002;55:892.
- ↵
Bosman FT. Continuous professional development in pathology: a continental view. J Clin Pathol2000;53:10–12.
- ↵
Du Boulay C. Continuing professional development: some new perspectives. J Clin Pathol1999;52:162–4.
- ↵
Cserni G. Axillary staging of breast cancer and the sentinel node. J Clin Pathol2000;53:733–41.
-
Montironi R, Mazzucchelli R, Algaba F, et al. Morphological identification of the patterns of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and their importance. J Clin Pathol2000;53:655–65.
-
Allford SL, Machin SJ. Current understanding of the pathophysiology of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. J Clin Pathol2000;53:497–501.
-
Edwards SL, Blessing K. Problematic pigmented lesions: approach to diagnosis. J Clin Pathol2000;53:409–18.
-
Chalmers EA. Neonatal thrombosis. J Clin Pathol2000;53:419–23.
-
Egner W. The use of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of SLE. J Clin Pathol2000;53:424–32.
-
McCluggage WG. Recent advances in immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms. J Clin Pathol2000;53:327–34.
-
Kilpatrick ES. Glycated haemoglobin in the year 2000. J Clin Pathol2000;53:335–9.
-
Hopwood P, Crawford DH. The role of EBV in post-transplant malignancies: a review. J Clin Pathol2000;53:248–54.
-
Timperley WR. Neuropathology. J Clin Pathol2000;53:255–65.
-
Helbert M, Breuer J. Monitoring patients with HIV disease. J Clin Pathol2000;53:266–72.
- ↵
Baglin T. Thrombophilia testing: what do we think the tests mean and what should we do with the results? J Clin Pathol2000;53:167–70.