Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Immune escape mechanisms in ALCL
  1. J J Oudejans,
  2. R L ten Berge,
  3. C J L M Meijer
  1. Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr J J Oudejans, VU University Medical Centre, Department of Pathology, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
 jj.oudejans{at}vumc.nl

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Why do host T cells not recognise and eradicate anaplastic large cell lymphomas?

Systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a CD30 positive T cell lymphoma with a broad spectrum of morphological, immune phenotypical, and clinical characteristics.1 Two clinicopathological entities can be distinguished: anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive systemic nodal ALCL and ALK negative systemic nodal ALCL. ALK expression, usually the result of a t(2;5) translocation, is related to a younger age, lower international prognostic index risk, and an excellent prognosis.2–4 Similar to most other lymphomas, ALCLs harbour many non-neoplastic, in principle immune competent, lymphocytes. In immune competent patients, putative expression of tumour antigens in ALCL (or any other lymphoma) should, in principle, elicit an antitumour immune response. Indeed, it was shown recently that ALK can elicit a humoral antitumour immune response in ALK positive patients with ALCL and that functional anti-ALK CTL precursors are present within the peripheral T cell repertoire of healthy donors, clearly indicating that ALK is a tumour antigen.5,6 In addition, the epithelial tumour antigen MUC1 (also known as EMA) is highly expressed in ALK positive ALCL,7 and MUC1 has been shown to elicit a MUC1 specific cytotoxic immune response in haematological malignancies.8 However, the very presence of tumour cells indicates that any antitumour immune response, whether humoral or cytotoxic, is apparently insufficient for the elimination of tumour cells. Assuming the presence of a specific antitumour immune response, this indicates that tumour cells have acquired mechanisms to escape from this immune response.

“In immune competent patients, putative expression of tumour antigens in anaplastic large cell lymphoma should, in principle, elicit an antitumour immune response”

DO ALCLS HARBOUR TUMOUR CELL SPECIFIC INFILTRATING LYMPHOCYTES?

We have shown previously that activated CTLs (that is, granzyme B and CD3/CD8 positive lymphocytes) can be detected in all ALCLs, and that the numbers …

View Full Text