Aim: To determine whether the terms used by pathologists in reporting on sudden infant deaths are applied consistently.
Method: Postal survey.
Results: Replies were received from 63 pathologists who carry out necropsies after sudden infant deaths. There was a pronounced variation in their use of the terms “sudden infant death syndrome” and “unascertained”, with the last term being applied not only when there were apparently suspicious features but also in various other circumstances. Opinions were divided as to whether the term “sudden infant death syndrome” still serves a useful purpose. Deaths that had occurred while bed sharing were categorised in several different ways. Many pathologists commented on the inadequacy of the history available to them at the time of their report.
Conclusions: There is a serious need for greater consistency in the way pathologists report on sudden death in infants. Pathologists should be provided with a full history before they carry out the necropsy.
- deaths categorised as “unascertained”
- sudden infant deaths
- terms used by pathologists
- ONS, Office of National Statistics
- SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome
- SUDI, sudden unexpected deaths in infancy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Lady Limerick is vice-chair and Dr Bacon is medical adviser to the Foundation for the Study of Infant Deaths, a charity that promotes research into infant deaths and supports bereaved parents.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.