You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 61, Issue 10
  • Comparison of examination of the entire cervix with routine cervical sampling in hysterectomy specimens from women with endometrial cancer: comment on a paper

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Letters
PostScript
Comparison of examination of the entire cervix with routine cervical sampling in hysterectomy specimens from women with endometrial cancer: comment on a paper
  1. M K Heatley
  1. Dr M K Heatley, Department of Histopathology, St. James’s University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF; markkheatley{at}hotmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    I read Nayar et al’s1 paper with great interest but wish to clarify a comment made by them about the paper Dr Greene and I published some years back.2 Although, in an earlier study, the distribution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) had led me to deduce that midline blocks were sufficient to identify an incidental lesion in patients with no previous history of a …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: None.