Aims: To identify priorities for improving effective use of laboratory services in a district hospital in Malawi.
Methods: A prospective observational study of clinician–patient interactions to analyse laboratory test requesting practices and utilisation of laboratory results. The proportion of tests that was appropriately ordered, processed and ultimately influenced clinical management was used to assess effectiveness of utilisation.
Results: 420 clinical consultations between health professionals and patients were observed. 92% of tests were ordered appropriately, 84% were processed by the laboratory and 64% of results influenced patient management. 73–79% of high-volume tests (haemoglobin, microscopy for malaria and tuberculosis) and 32% of low-volume tests influenced management.
Conclusions: 25% of commonly requested laboratory tests were not utilised effectively; because of the high volume, interventions to improve their use are likely to be cost effective. Although 68% of low-volume tests were not used efficiently, the cost of providing support for these tests in a resource-poor setting needs to be balanced against their clinical usefulness. In contrast to published information, this study shows significant under-requesting of laboratory tests that were available. Measures to increase appropriate test requests will have implications for clinician education as well as laboratory space, budgets and staffing levels.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding This study was funded by the Department for International Development, UK, through the HIV/AIDs Knowledge Programme of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine. The Department for International Development had no role in study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of this paper, or in the decision to submit the paper for publication, and it accepts no responsibility for the information or views expressed.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was obtained from the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK, and the Ministry of Health and Population, Malawi.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.