Responses

Download PDFPDF
Serrated and non-serrated polyps of the colorectum: their prevalence in an unselected case series and correlation of BRAF mutation analysis with the diagnosis of sessile serrated adenoma
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Response from Authors
    • Norman J Carr, Dr
    • Other Contributors:
      • Nicholas Hawkins, Hema Mahajan, King L Tan, Robyn Ward

    Dear Editor

    We thank Drs Rotimi and Reall for their comments, but would suggest that their criticisms have been framed by a perspective that is different from our own. Their perspective is the “most striking result” was that sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) were predominantly right sided. They are welcome to highlight this point, which is readily apparent from the data presented.

    Our perspective is t...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Serrated and non-serrated polyps of the colorectum...
    • Olorunda Rotimi, Consultant Histopathologist
    • Other Contributors:
      • Georgina Reall

    Dear Editor,

    Re: Serrated and non-serrated polyps of the colorectum: their prevalence in an unselected case series and correlation of BRAF mutation analysis with the diagnosis of sessile serrated adenoma

    We read with interest the article by Carr NJ et al (J Clin Pathol 2009;62:516-518). The article describes the prevalence of different colorectal polyps in an unselected population with a focus speci...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.