Download PDFPDF
Brucellosis in the UK: a risk to laboratory workers? Recommendations for prevention and management of laboratory exposure
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Human brucellosis - where, when, what and how?

    Dear Editor

    I fully endorse the recommendations of Reddy and co-workers concerning management of potential Brucella isolates and those staff potentially exposed 1. The authors highlight that clinical information may not always suggest potential brucellosis, especially if time has elapsed since exposure, thus suspicion may not be raised. The authors then proceed to describe four blood culture isolates obtained from patien...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.