Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Differential progression of renal scarring and determinants of late renal recovery in sustained dialysis dependent acute kidney injury secondary to myeloma kidney
  1. Kolitha Basnayake1,
  2. Chee Kay Cheung2,
  3. Michael Sheaff3,
  4. William Fuggle4,
  5. Dia Kamel5,
  6. Sandra Nakoinz4,
  7. Colin A Hutchison1,
  8. Mark Cook5,
  9. John Stoves2,
  10. Arthur R Bradwell6,
  11. Paul Cockwell1
  1. 1Renal Institute of Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2Department of Nephrology, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
  3. 3Department of Histopathology, Barts and the London NHS Trust, London, UK
  4. 4Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
  5. 5Department of Haematology, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  6. 6Division of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Kolitha Basnayake, Renal Institute of Birmingham, Department of Nephrology, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, University Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK; k.basnayake{at}


Background Most cases of dialysis-dependent acute kidney injury due to myeloma cast nephropathy do not recover renal function. Renal biopsy typically shows cast formation, direct tubular injury and interstitial inflammation caused by nephrotoxic monoclonal free light chains (FLC). Established scarring at presentation is rarely severe. There is little data on in situ evolution of renal injury.

Aims To conduct a detailed histological study of four patients with cast nephropathy.

Methods Cast nephropathy was confirmed by renal biopsy. Treatment consisted of chemotherapy and high cut-off dialysis to maximise extracorporeal removal of FLC and reduce renal toxicity. All four patients remained dialysis dependent at 6 weeks, at which time they underwent a further biopsy.

Results Three patients achieved independence from dialysis. Six-week biopsies showed differential changes in chronic damage from no progression, to accelerated progression of scarring from 10% to 42%, despite a rapid and sustained fall in FLC in all patients. In three patients there was a major reduction in intratubular cast numbers; these patients subsequently recovered renal function. In one patient who continued to have high cast formation at 6 weeks there was no subsequent renal recovery.

Conclusions Some FLC clones can promote rapid renal scarring. Significant reductions in cast formation on repeat biopsy may identify the potential for late renal recovery. Early diagnosis and treatment may prove crucial in determining renal recovery. Patients who have not recovered renal function after a period of treatment may be usefully reassessed by repeat biopsy for quantitative analysis of chronic damage and cast numbers.

  • Acute kidney injury
  • multiple myeloma
  • fibrosis
  • free light chain
  • index of chronic damage
  • fibrosis
  • kidney
  • myeloma
  • renal

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Competing interests ARB is a director of The Binding Site Ltd, Birmingham, UK. The Binding Site produces the Freelite assay. The other authors do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Solihull and South Birmingham Research Ethics Committees and the Research and Development Department of University Hospital Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.