Aims Although poor thymic function leading to viral and fungal infections can be a feature of chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, most patients have relatively normal immunity. The aim of this study was to investigate which clinical and laboratory parameters best predict the likelihood of serious or recurrent infections in patients with this syndrome.
Methods Clinical and laboratory parameters from 64 patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome referred to two immunology centres in the north of England were studied retrospectively.
Results 31 (48%) patients had no problems with infection, 21 (33%) had bacterial infections, and 12 (19%) had recurrent or persistent thrush and/or viral enteritis and bronchiolitis, the latter suggestive of a significant T cell immunodeficiency. Patients with a history of thrush/viral infections, but not those with bacterial infections, had significantly lower CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte numbers (relative risk (95% CI) 0.3 (0.1 to 0.8)) and phytohaemagglutinin mitogen responses (0.4 (0.2 to 0.8)) adjusted for age at testing. Hypoparathyroidism was associated with low T lymphocyte numbers and function (p<0.05) as well as an increased risk of thrush/viral infections (p<0.0001) after adjusting for age at testing.
Conclusions 22q11.2 syndrome patients with hypoparathyroidism are more likely to have a clinically significant T cell immunodeficiency and lower laboratory parameters of T cell function, with a higher risk of thrush and viral bronchiolitis and enteritis. Measurement of absolute CD3 count is a simple and accurate predictor of fungal/viral infection risk, with phytohaemagglutinin mitogen responses providing little or no further value in most patients.
- DiGeorge syndrome
- 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding No external funding.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.