Background The alpha-internexin (INA) gene encodes an intermediate filament involved in neurogenesis and maps in 10q24.33. A strong INA protein expression has been reported in oligodendroglial tumours and was associated with 1p19q deletion. To assess the relevance of INA immunohistochemistry in glioma typing, this paper studied the relationship between INA expression, histological type, genomic status and patient outcome.
Methods The study analysed INA, nestin, Olig2 and p53 expression, loss of heterozygosity of microsatellite markers from telomere to centromere of 10p, 10q, 1p and 19q chromosomes and epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) amplification in 40 gliomas (five astrocytomas, 12 oligodendrogliomas, 11 oligoastrocytomas, 12 glioblastomas). INA expression was scored as absent, weak (<10% of labelled tumour cells) or strong (>10%).
Results Oligodendrogliomas showed strong INA and Olig2 expression, and 1p19q whole loss of heterozygosity (wLOH). Astrocytomas and glioblastomas were characterised by no or weak INA expression, high p53 and nestin expression, 10p10q wLOH, and epidermal growth factor receptor amplification. Most oligoastrocytomas had characteristics of astrocytic tumours. All tumours with strong INA expression retained the 10q chromosome arm and, except for one, had a 1p19q wLOH status. However, despite a strong link between INA expression, 1p19q wLOH and 10q retention, discrepancies were observed in 10% of cases. The presence of INA expression, whether weak or strong, was related to a better prognosis.
Conclusion INA expression study can be helpful for glioma typing and prognosis determination in combination with other markers. Nevertheless, INA immunohistochemistry cannot replace the genomic analysis to determine 1p19q and 10p10q status.
- brain tumours
- central nerve system
- molecular markers
- molecular oncology
- 1p19q loss
- 10p10q loss
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding This study was funded by the Ligue contre Le Cancer du Limousin, Limoges 87000, France.
Competing interests None.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval All the samples were used in accordance with French bioethics laws regarding patient information and consent.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.