Article info
Original article
A prospective study comparing contamination rates between a novel mid-stream urine collection device (Peezy) and a standard method in renal patients
- Correspondence to Dr Sophie Elizabeth Collier, Department of Microbiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London Nw3 2QG, UK; sophiecollier{at}nhs.net
Citation
A prospective study comparing contamination rates between a novel mid-stream urine collection device (Peezy) and a standard method in renal patients
Publication history
- Received April 15, 2013
- Revised July 14, 2013
- Accepted July 26, 2013
- First published August 28, 2013.
Online issue publication
January 15, 2014
Article Versions
- Previous version (28 August 2013).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/