Aims To determine the diagnostic accuracy and contraindications for intraoperative diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) from frozen sections.
Methods A retrospective analysis of data from 136 patients pathologically diagnosed with early-stage (T1N0M0) AIS or MIA from paraffin-embedded sections. The rate of concordance between the diagnoses from intraoperative frozen sections and paraffin-embedded sections was determined, and the interpretive features that contributed to errors and deferrals in frozen-section diagnoses were identified.
Results Of the 136 patients, diagnoses from frozen sections and paraffin-embedded sections were concordant in 86 (63.24%) cases intraoperatively diagnosed with AIS or MIA, and 44 (32.35%) cases were intraoperatively diagnosed with adenocarcinoma as the range of infiltration could not be determined from the frozen sections. From the remaining six (4.41%) cases, the frozen section and paraffin-embedded section diagnoses were discordant. The reasons for frozen section errors and deferrals included larger tumour volume, tumour located close to the visceral pleura, interstitial inflammation or fibrosis, absence of prominent atypia and differential morphology in the deeper levels of the paraffin block.
Conclusions Diagnosis of AIS and MIA from intraoperative frozen sections is feasible. We provide several modifications that may improve the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen sections for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.
- LUNG CANCER
Statistics from Altmetric.com
PH and GY contributed equally.
Handling editor Cheok Soon Lee
Contributors JH and PH: conception and design. YG and YL: provision of study materials or patients and collection and assembly of data. PH, GY and YG: data analysis/interpretation. PH and GY: manuscript writing. PH, GY and JH: final approval of manuscript.
Funding Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Guangzhou Medical University (No. 2014C18) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2016A030310273).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval Ethics Committee of Guangzhou Medical University.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.