Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Diagnostic accuracy of haemoglobin colour strip (HCS-HLL), a digital haemoglobinometer (TrueHb) and a non-invasive device (TouchHb) for screening patients with anaemia
  1. Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi1,
  2. Himanshu Negandhi1,
  3. Rakhee Kar2,
  4. Maitrayee Bhattacharya3,
  5. Rajeev Sen4,
  6. Neelam Varma5,
  7. Priyanka Bharti1,
  8. Jyoti Sharma1,
  9. Himanshu Bhushan6,
  10. Sanjay Zodpey1,
  11. Renu Saxena7
  1. 1Indian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Gurgaon, Haryana, India
  2. 2Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India
  3. 3Department of Haematology, Calcutta Medical College, Kolkata, India
  4. 4Department of Pathology, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS), Rohtak, Haryana, India
  5. 5Department of Haematology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
  6. 6National Health Systems Resource Centre, New Delhi, India
  7. 7Department of Haematology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi, Indian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Plot number 47, Sector 44, Gurgaon 122002, Haryana, India: sutapa.bneogi{at}


Aim Estimation of haemoglobin (Hb) remains a challenge, particularly in outreach settings. There is a need to have a simple and cost-effective device to detect anaemia. Three devices (haemoglobin colour scale (HCS)-HLL (Hindustan Lifecare Limited), TrueHb V.1.1, TouchHb Alpha 1.1- non-invasive) have been developed in India recently. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of these tests (index) for the screening of anaemia against haematological autoanalyzer (reference).

Methods The study was conducted in four medical colleges of India. All consenting adult patients (>18 years of age) undergoing routine investigations were included. Each patient underwent the reference test and at least one index test. Outcome assessors for the index tests were blinded to the results of the reference test. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using cut-offs proposed by WHO.

Results A total of 5244 patients underwent the reference test while HCS-HLL, TrueHb and TouchHb tests were conducted on 2745, 2331 and 2874 patients respectively. The positive likelihood ratio of HCS-HLL using capillary blood (1.2), venous blood (1.7) and TouchHb (1.5) was lower than TrueHb capillary (3.7; 95% CI 3.3 to 4.2) and venous blood (5.7; 95% CI 4.9 to 6.6). TrueHb had a sensitivity of 74.4% (95% CI 71.9% to 76.8%) for venous and 82.0% (95% CI 79.8% to 89.2%) for capillary samples. The specificity was high (>75.0%). The area under receiver operating characteristic was close to 80.0%. Consistent results were seen for detection of severe anaemia.

Conclusions The digital method (TrueHb) emerged as a better diagnostic method for screening anaemia. Its effectiveness should be established in outreach settings before further recommendation.

  • diagnostic screening

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.