Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Measuring too much or too little in adult coeliac disease
  1. Marco Vincenzo Lenti,
  2. Gino Roberto Corazza
  1. First Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Professor Gino Roberto Corazza, First Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Piazzale Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy; gr.corazza{at}smatteo.pv.it

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Coeliac disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory enteropathy induced by dietary gluten in genetically susceptible individuals.1 CD has a worldwide distribution with a very high prevalence, and since undiagnosed adult patients entail a fourfold increased risk of death,2 a flawless diagnostic workup would be needed. At present, although current guidelines state that duodenal biopsy remains essential for the diagnosis of adult CD,3 4 expert opinions are rather heterogeneous and confusing. Actually, the two opposing lines of thought space from establishing a diagnosis only relying on CD serology,5 as already happens in paediatric CD when the transglutaminase 2 antibodies are 10 times over the upper limit of normal,6 to the careful and detailed morphometric evaluation of duodenal biopsy specimens,7 without clearly specifying the clinical settings in which such opposite strategies should be applied. The range of possibilities is even wider if we consider that the ‘fresh’ analysis of duodenal biopsies with a dissecting microscope is provided by high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of severe villous atrophy, the recognition of which would not require any detailed grading system.8 However, it is clear that this unsophisticated method cannot replace traditional histology, particularly in the cases of infiltrative or milder lesions or in the diagnosis of the complicated …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Tahir S Pillay.

  • Contributors MVL and GRC both participated in drafting and revising the manuscript. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.