Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Industry payments to pathologists in the USA between 2013 and 2021
  1. Anju Murayama,
  2. Shuto Hirota
  1. School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  1. Correspondence to Dr Anju Murayama, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan; ange21tera{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Although proper physician-industry financial relationships are essential for improving patient care, they can also cause potential conflicts of interest. However, little is known about the pathologist-industry financial relationships. Using the 2013-2021 Open Payments Database, this cross-sectional study investigated both research and non-research payments to all pathologists in the USA. Payment data were analyzed descriptively. Of 21,664 pathologists, 49.5% of all pathologists have received payments totaling $356.7 million from the healthcare industry, of which 68.2% were research payments. Median per-physician general and associated research payments (IQR) were $145($49–$575) and $70,926 ($17,450–$299,285) over the nine years. The top 1% of pathologists receiving general payments received 68.0% of all general payments. Male pathologists specializing in blood banking and transfusion medicine and hematopathology are significantly more likely than those not to receive research and non-research payments. This first study provides valuable insights into the financial relationships between pathologists and the healthcare industry.

  • ETHICS
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • Health Services

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Although proper physician-industry financial relationships are essential for improving patient care, they can also cause potential conflicts of interest. However, little is known about the pathologist-industry financial relationships. Using the 2013-2021 Open Payments Database, this cross-sectional study examined research and non-research payments to all pathologists in the United States. Payment data were analyzed descriptively at the individual physician level. Of 21,664 pathologists, 49.5% of all pathologists have received payments totaling $356.7 million from the healthcare industry, of which 68.2% were research payments. Median per-physician general and associated research payments (interquartile range [IQR]) were $145($49–$575) and $70,926 ($17,450–$299,285) over the nine years. The top 1% of pathologists receiving general payments received 68.0% of all general payments. Male pathologists and pathologists specializing in hematopathology were significantly more likely to receive industry payments. This study provides valuable insights into the financial relationships between pathologists and the healthcare industry.

  • Handling editor Runjan Chetty.

  • Contributors AM: conceptualisation; methodology; software; formal analysis; investigation; resources; data curation; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing; visualisation; study administration. SH: methodology; visualisation; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.