Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Aims This study aims to summarise published cases of reactive plasmacytosis to provide a resource to aid haematopathologists and clinicians in the diagnostic workup of reactive plasmacytosis.
Methods We searched published articles on reactive plasmacytosis on PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar. Data were screened following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Cases were classified into six categories, namely: (1) infection, (2) angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), (3) other malignancies, (4) drug associated, (5) autoimmune diseases and (6) others. Plasma cell percentage in peripheral blood and/or bone marrow was tabulated. Descriptive statistics were reported as median with IQR, using JASP Team.
Results 87 articles which reported on 146 patients were included. Infectious diseases represented most cases associated with reactive plasmacytosis (n=46, 31% of all cases), with viral infections being the most frequent (n=31, 21% of all cases). AITL was the second most frequent aetiology (n=34, 23% of all cases), followed by medications (n=28, 19% of all cases), other malignancies (n=18, 12% of all cases), miscellaneous aetiologies (n=11, 7% of all cases) and autoimmune diseases (n=9, 6% of all cases). The absolute and relative levels of plasma cells in each diagnostic category showed marked variation and ranges largely overlapped between categories.
Conclusions In patients with an increase in the number and/or proportion of plasma cells in peripheral blood and/or bone marrow, clinical context and a broad differential diagnosis are necessary to direct further evaluation and arrive at a correct diagnosis. Our literature review suggests that evaluation for infectious causes and AITL may be of the greatest yield in many cases.
- Plasma Cells
- Hematology
- BONE MARROW
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.
Footnotes
Handling editor Laurence de LEVAL.
X @margaritaMdT
Contributors MMdT performed data collection, statistical analysis, figures and drafted and revised the paper. She is the guarantor. SF-P initiated the collaborative project, analysed the data and drafted and revised the paper.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Map disclaimer The inclusion of any map (including the depiction of any boundaries therein), or of any geographical or locational reference, does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of BMJ concerning the legal status of any country, territory, jurisdiction or area or of its authorities. Any such expression remains solely that of the relevant source and is not endorsed by BMJ. Maps are provided without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.