Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Pragmatic guide to the macroscopic evaluation of breast specimens
  1. Yaileen D Guzmán-Arocho,
  2. Laura C Collins
  1. Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Laura C Collins, Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA; lcollins{at}bidmc.harvard.edu

Abstract

The pathological assessment of a breast surgical specimen starts with macroscopic evaluation, arguably one of the most critical steps, as only a small percentage of the tissue is examined microscopically. To properly evaluate and select tissue sections from breast specimens, it is essential to correlate radiological findings, prior biopsies, procedures and treatment with the gross findings. Owing to its fatty nature, breast tissue requires special attention for proper fixation to ensure appropriate microscopic evaluation and performance of ancillary studies. In addition, knowledge of the information necessary for patient management will ensure that these data are collected during the macroscopic evaluation, and appropriate sections are taken to obtain the information needed from the microscopic evaluation. Herein, we present a review of the macroscopic evaluation of different breast specimen types, including processing requirements, challenges and recommendations.

  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Methods
  • Tissue Fixation

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Runjan Chetty.

  • Twitter @guzmanarocho

  • Contributors Both authors contributed to the preparation, writing and review of this article.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.