Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of vacuum assisted stereotactic guided mammotome biopsy in the diagnostic management of screen detected calcifications and to rationalise its use versus diagnostic excision.
Methods The first 100 mammotome biopsies preceeded by a conventional needle core biopsy (NCB) were identified from the database of Leeds/Wakefield Breast Screening Service. The histological diagnosis on NCB and mammotome were reviewed and compared with the surgical histological diagnosis if excision had been performed.
Results Using mammotome diagnoses were changed in 74 of the 100 cases. In 66 cases a definitive diagnosis (B2 or B5) was obtained. The incidence of inadequate/unsatisfactory (B1) biopsies was reduced from 36% to 9%. In 34 cases mammotome was not helpful in arriving at a definite diagnosis (B1/B3/B4). All cases diagnosed as malignant with mammotome were proven to have in situ or invasive malignancy on excision except for one case of ductal in-situ carcinoma fully excised by mammotome. There was one false negative case of in-situ carcinoma with a prior benign (B2) mammotome diagnosis. Almost half the NCB uncertain (B3) cases required excision as the mammotome biopsies were also uncertain (B3). The majority were flat epithelial atypia and atypical intraductal proliferation.
Conclusions Mammotome biopsy is particularly useful for further assessment of an inadequate (B1) or suspicious (B4) NCB diagnosis. Diagnostic surgical excision remains the method of choice for managing atypical/uncertain lesions (B3).
- Breast cancer
- Flat epithelial atypia
- Needle core
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.