Background: In general practice, infectious conjunctivitis is a common and mostly (64%) self-limiting disorder. In case of aberrant course or severe symptoms a general practitioner may take a culture. Direct inoculation is considered the reference standard but usually a swab is sent to a laboratory.
Objectives: To compare the diagnostic performance of the swab, transported by surface mail with direct inoculation.
Methods: 19 General practitioners took two samples of the conjunctiva from 88 patients with symptoms suggestive of infectious conjunctivitis by rolling a cotton swab across the conjunctiva of the lower fornix. One swab was used to inoculate 3 agar plates directly, while the other was sent in a Stuart medium to the laboratory and inoculated at the time of arrival. We compared the number of positive cultures of both methods.
Results: A pathogen was found in 31 of 88 samples (35% (95%Confidence Interval:26 to 46)). Surprisingly, the number of positive cultures was higher for the Stuart medium (27/88), than for direct inoculation (23/88). The difference was 4,5%(90%CI:0 to 12, p=0.388; one-sided McNemar's test for paired proportions). In five of the 19 samples, that were positive in both tests the cultured pathogen were different.
Conclusions: We found that the Stuart medium detected more bacteria than direct inoculation. The lower 90%confidence bound, testing non-inferiority at p=.05 indicates that is is unlikely that the Stuart medium misses any positive cultures compared to direct inoculation.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.