Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Correspondence
Intranodal palisaded myofibroblastoma – an unusual entity
  1. Sakinah A Thiryayi1,
  2. Brian Andrews2,
  3. Gillian L Hall1,
  4. Iskander H Chaudhry1
  1. 1Department of Histopathology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
  2. 2Department of Surgery, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sakinah A Thiryayi, Department of Histopathology, 1st Floor, Clinical Sciences Building 1, Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; sakinah.a.t{at}hotmail.co.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Intranodal palisaded myofibroblastoma (IPM) is a rare lymph node lesion that has been recognised as an entity since 1989, initially having been known by different names, including ‘solitary spindle cell tumour with myoid differentiation of the lymph node’1 and ‘intranodal hemorrhagic spindle cell tumour with amianthoid fibres’.2 More than 50 cases have now been described, the majority of which have involved inguinal lymph nodes. The tumour is slightly more common in men and occurs over a wide age range (19–71 years).3 We report another case and discuss the nature, nomenclature and differential diagnosis of this entity.

A 74-year-old man presented with a 2-year history of a lump in the right groin, which had recently increased in size. On examination it was found to be firm, mobile and non-pulsatile. There was no surrounding inguinal lymphadenopathy. An ultrasound scan revealed a focal solid area (2×2 cm) of mixed echogenicity with some vascularity. Possible differential diagnoses were thought to be fat necrosis, calcifying epithelioma or epidermal cyst. The mass was excised and macroscopically it was a smooth …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None to declare.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.