Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
A rare and unusual cause of mammographic calcification in the breast
  1. Andrew Robinson1,
  2. Abeer M Shaaban2
  1. 1Department of Musculoskeletal Pathology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Abeer M Shaaban, Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital and University of Birmingham, B15 2GW, Birmingham, UK; a.shaaban{at}nhs.net

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Clinical question

A 45-year-old woman is found, on family history screening, to have calcification within the upper outer quadrant of her right breast. A diagnostic mammotome biopsy was performed. Review the interactive digital slide and consider your diagnosis and appropriate management.

What is your diagnosis?

  1. Collagenous spherulosis

  2. Flat epithelial atypia with psammomatous calcification

  3. Liesegang rings with lactational changes

  4. Parasitic infection

  5. Spheroid type amyloid

Discussion

Answer: C

Histologically, there are focal collections of dilated ducts and microcysts lined by vacuolated epithelium showing lactational change. Many rounded concentric calcifications of various sizes are seen within the ductal lumina. These show characteristic appearances of Liesegang rings. In some ducts, the rings surround amorphous material with histologically identifiable calcific deposits. A mild chronic inflammatory infiltrate is seen in-between ducts.

Liesegang rings are spherical, ring-like …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Iskander Chaudhry

  • Contributors AR and AS diagnosed the lesion, searched the literature and contributed to the writing up. Both authors approved the final manuscript.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Correction
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists