Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Evaluation of an enhanced pathological examination protocol for sentinel lymph nodes from patients with breast carcinoma
  1. Ciara Murray,
  2. Asmaa Al Shehhi,
  3. Ciarán Ó'Riain,
  4. Barbara Dunne,
  5. Aoife Maguire
  1. Department of Histopathology, Saint James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Aoife Maguire, Department of Histopathology, Saint James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; aoifemaguire{at}physicians.ie

Abstract

Clinical trials have shown that many patients with breast cancer with limited sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastatic disease can safely avoid axillary lymph node dissection. Ultra-staging of initially negative SLNs may not confer additional clinical benefit. Despite this, protocols of ‘enhanced pathological examination’ (EPE) are still widely used. We evaluated the impact of our EPE protocol. If initial SLN H&Es are negative, we cut three additional H&E levels at 500 µm intervals with two spare sections at each level, to allow for immunohistochemistry if necessary. Occult micrometastases or isolated tumour cells were identified, using this protocol, in 3.4%, resulting in change of N stage in 3%. 1% of patients had further axillary surgery based on these findings. Our SLN-EPE protocol provided additional information in a small number of cases and changed axillary management in a minority. It represented a significant workload for scientists and pathologists, and had time and cost implications. We concluded that emphasising careful gross examination along with judicious use of additional levels and immunohistochemistry may be more beneficial than our current protocol.

  • sentinel lymph node
  • breast neoplasms
  • pathology
  • surgical
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Cheok Soon Lee.

  • Contributors CM contributed to conduction of the work, writing the paper and construction of figures. AAS conducted some of the work. BD conducted some of the work. COR conducted some of the work and contributed to writing the paper. AM planned the project, conducted work, contributed to writing the paper and constructing figures.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.