Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Paraduodenal/pancreatic Ewing sarcoma is very rare and therefore may be mistaken for neuroendocrine carcinoma
  1. Newton A C S Wong1,
  2. Sari Suortamo2,
  3. Elinor George3,
  4. Sophie Beavers1
  1. 1Cellular Pathology, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
  2. 2Cellular and Anatomical Pathology, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
  3. 3Cellular Pathology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Newton A C S Wong, Cellular Pathology, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK; nacs.wong{at}bristol.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

A diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma (ES) is suggested by certain morphological and immunohistochemical findings and supported by demonstration of EWSR1 translocation,1 as is usually demonstrated generically with a break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) probe. However, because there are differential diagnoses that also harbour EWSR1 translocations (eg, desmoplastic small round cell tumour, DSRCT), ES can only be confirmed by demonstrating a fusion partner regarded to be ES specific.1 The most common of these partners are FLI1 (85% of ES) and ERG (10% of ES).1 Most ESs arise in bone or soft tissues1 and here, pathologists are primed to consider other neoplasms which mimic ES morphologically and/or immunohistochemically. However, there are visceral sites from where ES can rarely arise and may not, therefore, be suspected. The following report shows one such site to be in/around the pancreas and how ES here may especially be mistaken for neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Distinguishing between the two diagnoses is clinically crucial in dictating different patient management, including chemotherapeutic regimes.2 3

Patient A presented in his early 40s with abdominal pain. His cross-sectional imaging showed a 7 cm diameter mass between the duodenum and pancreatic head. Endoscopy revealed duodenal ulceration and biopsies from here contained neoplastic epithelioid cells with scant cytoplasm, closely packed, small nuclei (figure 1) and an immunoprofile presented in table 1. …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Runjan Chetty.

  • Contributors NACSW conceived the idea for this article. All the authors collected clinicopathological data for the presented cases and contributed to the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.