Article Text
Abstract
Aims and methods Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is currently considered to be classified into three clinical subtypes, including idiopathic plasmacytic lymphadenopathy (IPL), thrombocytopaenia, anasarca, fever, reticulin fibrosis/renal dysfunction, organomegaly (TAFRO) and not otherwise specified (NOS). Among the three, iMCD-IPL closely mimics IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD). In diagnosing IgG4-RD, it is sometimes challenging to distinguish iMCD-IPL patients that also meet the histological diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RD. In this study, we focused on the number of IgG4-positive cells in the lymph nodes and analysed the relationship with laboratory findings to distinguish iMCD-IPL from IgG4-RD. Thirty-nine patients with iMCD-IPL and 22 patients with IgG4-RD were included.
Results Among the cases considered to be iMCD-IPL, 33.3% (13/39) cases also met the histological diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RD and serum IgG4 levels were not different between the two groups. However, the serum IgG4/IgG ratio was significantly higher in IgG4-RD, with a cut-off value of 19.0%. Additionally, a significant positive correlation between serum IgG levels and the number of IgG4-positive cells was observed in iMCD-IPL (p=0.001). The serum IgG cut-off value for distinguishing iMCD-IPL meeting histological criteria for IgG4-RD from other iMCD-IPL was 5381 mg/dL.
Conclusions iMCD-IPL cases with high serum IgG levels (>5000 mg/dL) were likely to meet the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RD because of the numerous IgG4-positive cells observed. A combination of clinical presentations, laboratory values including the serum IgG4/IgG ratios and histological analysis is crucial for diagnosis of IgG4-RD and iMCD-IPL.
- Hematology
- Histology
- IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY
- INFLAMMATION
- LYMPH NODES
Data availability statement
Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study. Not applicable.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study. Not applicable.
Footnotes
Handling editor Vikram Deshpande.
AN and MFN contributed equally.
Contributors Conceptualisation, AN, MFN and YS; methodology, AN; formal analysis, AN; investigation, AN, KM, TT, MK, NN, SM, RS, TK, AK and HY; data curation, AN, KM and TH; writing—original draft preparation, AN; writing—review and editing, YN, DCF and FvR; supervision, FvR and YS. YS is responsible for the overall content as guarantor. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant number JP 23K1447605, MHLW Programme grant number JPMH 23FC1025, JPMH 23FC1015 and AMED under grant number JP 22ek0109589h0001.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.