eLetters

70 e-Letters

published between 2003 and 2006

  • Demand control in pathology
    William SA Smellie

    Dear Editor

    Rao et al. describe a wide range of testing in pathology where targeted effort could improve appropriateness.[1]

    One of the blocks to improving use of pathology testing is the limited evidence base. This should not stop us however trying to improve practice.[2] The medical literature contains a large resource of reviews and consensus guidance, some of which has an evidence base, and the...

    Show More
  • Re: Investigation of infertility
    S Vivekanandan

    Dear Editor

    The article by Williams et al. [1] published in April issue highlights the analytical issues related to LH measurement, as reported.[2] The article fails to mention problems with measurement of steroid hormones due to the presence of closely related cross-reacting substances.[3] Traditionally, most steroid hormones were determined after removing those cross reactants by various methods, most co...

    Show More
  • Nutritional vitamin B12 deficiency
    Reg P Britt

    Dear Editor

    I read with interest the case report by GL Stark and PJ Hamilton [1]. In 1970 we drew attention to the occurrence of megaloblastic anaemia in asian migrants coming to the UK [2]. Further investigation [3,4] revealed many of these to be nutritional vitamin B12 deficiency.

    The features in the case reported certainly do not rule out this possibility in their patient. They administered three injec...

    Show More
  • Authors' reply
    Christian Gulmann

    Dear Editor

    We are grateful to Dr Campodonico’s for the interest shown in our recent report of a case of chronic osteomyelitis mimicking a sarcoma.[1,2] The main point made in the letter is the need for a high level of suspicion of malignancy in unusual cases of chronic osteomyelitis (COM).

    We entirely agree with this point of view. In fact, the reason for reporting the present case was that to highlight the...

    Show More
  • BAS post vasectomy guidelines
    Paul Hancock

    Dear Editor

    In reply to the points raised by Cunningham et al.[1] to the British Andrology Society post vasectomy guidelines, we feel that the authors answer their own criticism - especially the need to assess fresh samples if sperm are found in the initial sample. Our guidelines are to allow the identification of men with few motile cells following heavy c...

    Show More
  • It's time for truth!
    Marcello Eusepi

    Dear Editor

    I think the time has come for the medical profession to admit a major mistake in its history and for a moment leave pride and arrogance on one side. I have a university degree, am father of two and have spent several days reading books about childhood vaccination and information downloaded from the Internet. As vaccination was a “joke” of industrial development, owing to the coincidence of improving general...

    Show More
  • Chronic osteomyelitis mimicking sarcoma
    Fabio Campodonico

    Dear Editor

    Gulmann et al. reported on a case of chronic osteomyelitis presenting as a mass of the chest mimicking a soft tissue sarcoma.[1] The authors suggested that, although chronic osteomyelitis is a known cause of confusion with bone tumors, a definitive diagnosis is feasible by specific immunohistochemical staining. However, the potential risk of transformation of a chronic osteomyelitis in a malignant l...

    Show More
  • Urachal neoplasia and pseudomyxoma peritonei
    Norman J Carr

    Dear Editor

    I read with interest the case report by Stenhouse et al. [1] since I recently discussed the terminology of these lesions in a report of a similar case.[2]

    The parallels between mucinous neoplasms of the urachus and of the appendix are striking. They have similar morphology and both can produce the clinical picture of pseudomyxoma peritonei, in which low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma caus...

    Show More
  • Assessment of post vasectomy semen samples
    Richard Cunningham

    Dear Editor

    We read with interest the British Andrology Society (BAS) guidelines for the assessment of post vasectomy semen samples (2002).[1] The authors have carried out a thorough and comprehensive review of the topic, and we are convinced by their recommendation that assessment should be undertaken 16 weeks and at least 24 ejaculates after vasectomy. We are unconvinced however, by the specific recommendations ab...

    Show More
  • Historical perspectives and web pages
    Alan Rubin

    Dear Editor

    I read the contribution in Historical Perspectives, 'Molten gold was poured down his throat until his bowels burst,'[1] with mounting horror and incredulity. Though the subject atter was unusual and the animal model dubious, I was most puzzled by the nature of the references. The second and fourth references are to web pages. Investigation of these pages shows that both are postings taken from books at lea...

    Show More

Pages