@article {Heard43, author = {S R Heard and C Roberts and S J Furrows and M Kelsey and L Southgate}, title = {Corridor consultations and the medical microbiological record: is patient safety at risk?}, volume = {56}, number = {1}, pages = {43--47}, year = {2003}, doi = {10.1136/jcp.56.1.43}, publisher = {BMJ Publishing Group}, abstract = {The performance procedures of the General Medical Council are aimed at identifying seriously deficient performance in a doctor. The performance procedures require the medical record to be of a standard that enables the next doctor seeing the patient to give adequate care based on the available information. Setting standards for microbiological record keeping has proved difficult. Over one fifth of practising medical microbiologists (including virologists) in the UK (139 of 676) responded to a survey undertaken by the working group developing the performance procedures for microbiology, to identify current practice and to develop recommendations for agreement within the profession about the standards of the microbiological record. The cumulative frequency for the surveyed recording methods used indicated that at various times 65\% (90 of 139) of respondents used a daybook, 62\% (86 of 139) used the back of the clinical request card, 57\% (79 of 139) used a computer record, and 22\% (30 of 139) used an index card system to record microbiological advice, suggesting wide variability in relation to how medical microbiologists maintain clinical records.}, issn = {0021-9746}, URL = {https://jcp.bmj.com/content/56/1/43}, eprint = {https://jcp.bmj.com/content/56/1/43.full.pdf}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Pathology} }