PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - R Manji AU - M Lotlikar AU - F Zhang AU - C C Ginocchio TI - Clinical evaluation of NucliSENS magnetic extraction and NucliSENS analytical specific reagents for the real-time detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in paediatric respiratory specimens AID - 10.1136/jcp.2009.066688 DP - 2009 Nov 01 TA - Journal of Clinical Pathology PG - 998--1002 VI - 62 IP - 11 4099 - http://jcp.bmj.com/content/62/11/998.short 4100 - http://jcp.bmj.com/content/62/11/998.full SO - J Clin Pathol2009 Nov 01; 62 AB - Aims: To evaluate the combination of NucliSENS magnetic extraction and NucliSENS analytical specific reagents (bioMérieux, Marcy L’Etoile, France) for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) from a variety of respiratory samples. Methods: Nucleic acids (NA) from paediatric samples (n = 603) and an RSV-specific inhibition control (R-IC) were coextracted using the miniMAG and/or the easyMAG. Nucleic-acid-sequence-based amplification (NASBA) and molecular beacon detection of RSV and R-IC were performed using NucliSENS analyte-specific reagents (NRSVA) and the NucliSENS EasyQ Analyzer. NRSVA results were compared with R-Mix culture and direct fluorescent antibody detection (DFA). Results: The NRSVA analytical specificity was 100%, and the NRSVA limit of detection was 5–20 RNA copies/reaction. The prediscordant analysis, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were, respectively, for R-Mix (64.7%, 100%, 100%, 94.5%); DFA (98.8%, 99.0%, 94.4%, 99.8%); NRSVA (94.1%, 95%, 75.5%, 99%). After discordant analysis, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were, respectively, for R-Mix (56.7%, 100%, 100%, 92.3%); DFA (87.6%, 99.2%, 95.5%, 97.7%); NRSVA (93.8%, 97%, 85.9%, 99%). RSV was detected in 17.8% of the samples and in seven coinfections. Children with proven RSV infection, compared with children without a pathogen identified, had shorter median hospitalisation stays (2 days vs 3 days, p = 0.035), used fewer antibiotics (54% vs 69%) and had shorter durations of antibiotic therapy (6.2 days vs 9.3 days, p = 0.021), respectively. Conclusions: NRSVA is sensitive and specific for RSV detection in respiratory samples. The R-IC monitored the test process, including NA extraction, target amplification and detection. The rapid detection of respiratory pathogens can foster appropriate patient management.