Summary of remarks made by the experts in each case in relation to the type of downgrading (see also table 2)
| Type of grade change | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remark | Indef ND | % | LGD ND | % | LGD Indef | % | HGD ND | % | HGD Indef | % | HGD LGD | % | Overall | % |
| Note that the experts did not always make a remark in the case of downgrading so that the number of downgradings is higher than the number of remarks. | ||||||||||||||
| ND, no dysplasia; Indef, indefinite; LGD, low grade dysplasia; HGD, high grade dysplasia, SCJ, squamo–columnar junction. | ||||||||||||||
| SCJ nearby | 2 | 25% | 13 | 52% | 1 | 13% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 16 | 32% |
| Reactive changes | 3 | 38% | 2 | 8% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 5 | 10% |
| Severe inflammation | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 13% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 4% |
| Ulcur | 2 | 25% | 3 | 12% | 4 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 9 | 18% |
| Others | 1 | 13% | 7 | 28% | 2 | 25% | 5 | 100% | 1 | 50% | 2 | 100% | 18 | 36% |
| Total | 8 | 100% | 25 | 100% | 8 | 100% | 5 | 100% | 2 | 100% | 2 | 100% | 50 | 100% |