Comparison between data from automated cytomorphometric analysis and manual assessment
| Cytomorphometric analysis versus manual assessment | ||
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Post-treatment | |
| Non-parametric (Spearman) correlation coefficients and linear regression data are shown. Linear regression results are shown as slope (SE)/intercept (SE). Intercepts deviating significantly from 0 are indicated with asterisks. | ||
| *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. | ||
| Percentage (para)basal | ||
| Correlation | 0.88*** | 0.92*** |
| Linear regression | 1.1 (0.1)/−8.0 (3.6)* | 0.91 (0.1)/−5.9 (4.9) |
| Percentage intermediate | ||
| Correlation | 0.79*** | 0.79*** |
| Linear regression | 1.1 (0.2)/22.7 (8.1)** | 1.0 (0.2)/32.0 (8.8)*** |
| Percentage superficial | ||
| Correlation | 0.41* | 0.41* |
| Linear regression | 0.03 (0.01)/−0.2 (0.4) | 0.1 (0.03)/−1.3 (1.0) |
| Maturation value | ||
| Correlation | 0.83*** | 0.86*** |
| Linear regression | 0.8 (0.1)/−0.1 (3.9) | 0.7 (0.1)/9.1 (3.9)* |