Table 1

Demographic and practice characteristics of participating pathologists (n=252)

Does participant's laboratory have a policy requiring a second opinion?
Participant characteristicsTotal n (col %)No policy n (row %)Any policy* n (row %)p Value†
Total252 (100.0)85 (33.7)167 (66.3)
Demographics
Age at survey (years)0.30
 30–3932 (12.7)9 (28.1)23 (71.9)
 40–4987 (34.5)25 (28.7)62 (71.3)
 50–5990 (35.7)32 (35.6)58 (64.4)
 60+43 (17.1)19 (44.2)24 (55.8)
Gender0.65
 Male159 (63.1)52 (32.7)107 (67.3)
 Female93 (36.9)33 (35.5)60 (64.5)
State of clinical practice0.14
 Alaska8 (3.2)4 (50.0)4 (50.0)
 Maine22 (8.7)4 (18.2)18 (81.8)
 Minnesota42 (16.7)20 (47.6)22 (52.4)
 New Hampshire13 (5.2)3 (23.1)10 (76.9)
 New Mexico15 (6.0)7 (46.7)8 (53.3)
 Oregon40 (15.9)14 (35.0)26 (65.0)
 Vermont20 (7.9)8 (40.0)12 (60.0)
 Washington92 (36.5)25 (27.2)67 (72.8)
Training and experience
Laboratory group practice size0.19
 <10 Pathologists158 (62.7)58 (36.7)100 (63.3)
 ≥10 Pathologists94 (37.3)27 (28.7)67 (71.3)
Fellowship training in surgical or breast pathology0.16
 No129 (51.2)41 (31.8)88 (68.2)
 Yes, breast Pathology4 (1.6)0 (0.0)4 (100.0)
 Yes, surgical111 (44.0)43 (38.7)68 (61.3)
 Both8 (3.2)1 (12.5)7 (87.5)
Affiliation with academic medical centre0.098
 No183 (72.6)59 (32.2)124 (67.8)
 Yes, adjunct/affiliated42 (16.7)12 (28.6)30 (71.4)
 Yes, primary appointment27 (10.7)14 (51.9)13 (48.1)
Do your colleagues consider you an expert in breast pathology?0.42
 No200 (79.4)65 (32.5)135 (67.5)
 Yes52 (20.6)20 (38.5)32 (61.5)
Clinical practice and experience
Breast pathology experience (years)0.12
 <546 (18.3)10 (21.7)36 (78.3)
 5–944 (17.5)16 (36.4)28 (63.6)
 10–1989 (35.3)28 (31.5)61 (68.5)
 ≥2073 (29.0)31 (42.5)42 (57.5)
Breast specimen case load (%)0.94
 <10126 (50.0)43 (34.1)83 (65.9)
 10–24104 (41.3)34 (32.7)70 (67.3)
 ≥2522 (8.7)8 (36.4)14 (63.6)
No. breast cases (per week)0.85
 <557 (22.6)20 (35.1)37 (64.9)
 5–9109 (43.3)34 (31.2)75 (68.8)
 10–1964 (25.4)24 (37.5)40 (62.5)
 ≥2022 (8.7)7 (31.8)15 (68.2)
  • *Policy was dichotomised to no policy (includes not known and laboratories that did not require second opinion) versus having a policy requiring a second opinion for at least one of four initial diagnoses (in which percentage of cases requiring a second opinion was >0%). Including invasive cancer, DCIS, atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and/or benign cases.

  • †p Value for no policy versus policy from the χ2 test.