Skip to main content
Log in

Using an artificial neural network to diagnose hepatic masses

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using abdominal ultrasonographic data and laboratory tests, radiologists often find differential diagnoses of hepatic masses difficult. A computerized second opinion would be especially helpful for clinicians in diagnosing liver cancer because of the difficulty of such diagnoses. A back-propagation neural network was designed to diagnose five classifications of hepatic masses: hepatoma, metastic carcinoma, abscess, cavernous hemangioma, and cirrhosis. The network input consisted of 35 numbers per patient case that represented ultrasonographic data and laboratory tests. The network architecture had 35 elements in the input layer, two hidden layers of 35 elements each, and 5 elements in the output layer. After being trained to a learning tolerance of 1%, the network classified hepatic masses correctly in 48 of 64 cases. An accuracy of 75% is higher than the 50% scored by the average radiology resident in training but lower than the 90% scored by the typical board-certified radiologist. When sufficiently sophisticated, a neural network may significantly improve the analysis of hepatic-mass radiographs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bryan, P.J., Dinn, W.M., Grossman, Z.D., Wistow, B.W., McAfee, J.G., Kieffer, S.A., Correlation of computed tomography, gray scale ultrasonography, and radionuclide imaging of the liver in detecting space-occupying processes.Radiology 124:387–393, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson, M.M., and Illingworth, W.T.,A Practical Guide to Neural Nets. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sugarbaker, P.H., and Kemeny, N., Management of metastatic liver cancer.Adv. Surgery 22:1–55, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sugarbaker, P.H., Surgical decision making for large bowel cancer metastatic to the liver.Radiology 174:621–626, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adson, M.A., Van Heerden, J.A., Adson, M.H., Wayner, J.S., Ilstrup, D.M., Resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.Arch. Surgery 119:647–651, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Malt, R.A., Current concepts: Surgery for hepatic neoplasms.New Eng. J. Med. 313:1591–1596, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrucci, J.T., Liver tumor imaging: current concepts.Amer. J.l Radiol. 155:473–484, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boone, J.M., Gross, G.W., and Greco-Hunt, V., Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis.Invest. Radiol. 25:1012–1016, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gross, G.W., Boone, J.M., Greco-Hunt, V., and Greenberg, B., Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis. II. Interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs.Invest. Radiol. 25:1017–1023, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maclin, P.S., Dempsey, J., Brooks, J., and Rand, J., using neural networks to diagnose renal cancer.J. Med. Syst. (U.S.), 15(1):11–19, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mulsant, B.H., A neural network as an approach to clinical diagnosis.MD Comp 7(1):25–36, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frenger, P., The silicon synapse or neural net computing.Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 25:267–73, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Braham, R., and Hamblen, J.O., On the behavior of some associative neural networks.Biol. Cybernetics (West Germany), 2:145–151, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crick, F., Neural networks and REM sleep.Biosci. Rep. (England) 8(6):531–535, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shadmehr, R., and D'Argenio, D.Z., A neural network for nonlinear Bayesian estimation in drug therapy.Neural Comput. 2:216–225, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lippmann, R.P., Review of neural networks for speech recognition.Neural Comput. 1:1–38, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elman, J.L., and Zipser, D., Learning the hidden structure of speech.J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 83(4):1615–26, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Poli, R., Cagnoni, S., Livi, R., Coppini, G., Valli, G., A neural network expert system for diagnosing and treating hypertension.Computer 24:3, 64–71, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Piraino, D.W., Amartur, S.C., Richmond, B.J., Schils, J.P., Thome, J.M., Belhobek, G.H., and Schlucter, M.D., Application of an artificial neural network in radiographic diagnosis.J. Digital Imaging 4(4):226–232, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Borman, S., Neural network applications in chemistry begin to appear.Chem Engineering News 67:24–28, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Simpson, P.K.,Artificial Neural Systems. New York: Pergamon Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dyke, R., NeuralWorks Professional II review.Neural Network News. Atlanta: AIWeek Inc., 1(3), 5, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Blum, Adam, Bidirectional Associative Memory Systems in C + +.Dr. Dobb's J. 15(4), 16–26, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bounds, David G., and Lloyd, Paul J. A mltilayer perception network for the diagnosis of low back pain.Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks Vol. II. 483–489, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guha, A., Using small multilayer networks to search real hyperspaces. Neural Networks Supplement:INNS Abstracts, 1:337, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. BrainMaker Users Guide and Reference Manual (4th edition), Sierra Madre, CA: California Scientific Software, 1990.

  27. Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L., and PDP Research Group,Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Vols. 1, 2. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McClelland, J.L., and Rumelhart, D.E.,Explorations in Parallel Distributed Processing Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wasserman, P.D.,Neural Computing: Theory Pract. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Neurocomputers 4(4):5, 1990. (Newsletter published monthly by Gallifrey Publishing, P.O. Box 155, Vicksburg, MI 49097. Name later changed toSixth Generation Systems newsletter.)

  31. Asad, N., Doi, K., MacMahon, H.,et al. Potential usefulness of an artificial neural network for differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease: pilot study.Radiology 177:857–860, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maclin, P.S., Dempsey, J. Using an artificial neural network to diagnose hepatic masses. J Med Syst 16, 215–225 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000274

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000274

Keywords

Navigation