Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of touch preps for intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative touch prep (TP) is highly accurate for determining positive breast cancer margins and thereby reducing the need for second surgeries. It also may be useful in determining the status of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) during the initial surgical resection. The objective of this study was to test the ability of intraoperative TP to predict metastatic disease and, thus, the necessity for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) at the time of SLN biopsy.

Methods: Fifty-five patients with invasive breast cancer were entered in the SLN biopsy protocol. The SLN was identified by gamma probe, dissected, and sent to pathology for TP and permanent sections. Level I and II ALND was then performed. Any radiolabeled LN in the lymphadenectomy specimen also was sent for TP and permanent sections.

Results: A total of 124 radiolabeled lymph nodes (LNs) were submitted for TP; of these, 93 (75%) were SLNs. Pathologic diagnosis by TP was correct compared with permanent sections for 99.2% of the nodes. There were no false positives. There was one (0.8%) false negative. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 99%. Sensitivity was 95.7% and specificity was 100%.

Conclusions: TP is a simple, quick, and accurate method for detecting metastatic disease in the SLN and, when used intraoperatively, enables the surgeon to determine whether or not an ALND is necessary at the time of the initial surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Statman R, Giuliano AE. The role of the sentinel lymph node in the management of patients with breast cancer.Adv Surg 1997;30:339–44.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cady B. Is axillary lymph node dissection necessary in routine management of breast cancer? No.The Breast Journal 1997;3:246–60.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Silverstein MJ, Gierson ED, Waisman JR, et al. Axillary lymph node dissection for T1a breast carcinoma. Is it indicated?Cancer 1994;73:664.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.Ann Surg 1994;220:391–401.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Albertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox C, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer.JAMA 1996;276:1818–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes.Lancet 1997;349:1864–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke MR, Landreneau RJ, Borochovitz D. Intraoperative imprint cytology for evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy.Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:1206–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gentry JF. Pelvic lymph node metastases in prostatic carcinoma.Am J Surg Pathol 1986;10:718–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghandur-Mnaymneh L, Paz J. The use of touch preparations (tissue imprints) in the rapid intraoperative diagnosis of metastatic lymph node disease in cancer staging procedures.Cancer 1985;56:339–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giuliano AE, Dale PS, Turner RR, et al. Improved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomy.Ann Surg 1995;222:394–401.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dudgeon LS, Patrick CV. A new method for the rapid microscopical diagnosis of tumors: with an account of 200 cases examined.Br J Surg 1927;15:250–61.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuntozoglou TE, Cramer HM. The advantages of intraoperative cytology: analysis of 215 smears and review of the literature.Acta Cytol 1991;35:154–64.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moore RD, Reagan JW. A cellular study of lymph node imprints.Cancer 1953;6:606–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Klimberg VS, Westbrook KC, Korourian S. Intraoperative touch preps in breast cancer surgery.Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5:220–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alex JC, Weaver DL, Fairbank JT, Rankin BS, Krag DN. Gamma-probe-guided lymph node localization in malignant melanoma.Surg Oncol 1993;2:303–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe.Surg Oncol 1993;2:335–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carson FL. Routine staining. In:Histotechnology: A Self-Instructional Text. Chicago: American Society of Clinical Pathologists, 1990:89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gal R. Scrape cytology assessment of margins of lumpectomy specimens in breast cancer.Acta Cytol 1988;32:838–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Greenberg RS. Medical epidemiology. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rubio IT, Korourian S, Krag D, Colvert M, Westbrook KC, Klimberg VS. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging breast cancer. Southwestern Surgical Association Meeting, San Antonio, TX, April 19–22, 1998.

  21. Alex JC, Krag DN. The gamma-probe-guided resection of radiolabeled primary lymph nodes.Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1996;5:33–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Suen KC, Wood WS, Syed AA, Quenville NF, et al. Role of imprint cytology in intraoperative diagnosis: value and limitations.Acta Cytol 1978;31:328–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Quill DS, Leahy AL, Lawler RG, Finney RD. Lymph node imprint cytology for the rapid assessment of axillary node metastases in breast cancer.Br J Surg 1984;71:454–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fischer CJ, Boyle S, Burke M, Price AB. Intraoperative assessment of nodal status in the selection of patients with breast cancer for axillary clearance.Br J Surg 1993;80:457–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hadjiminas J, Burke M. Intraoperative assessment of nodal status in the selection of patients with breast cancer for axillary clearance.Br J Surg 1994;81:1615–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hainsworth PJ, Tjandra JJ, Stillwell RG, et al. Detection and significance of occult metastases in node-negative breast cancer.Br J Surg 1993;80:459–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. deMascarel I, Bonichon F, Coindre JM, Trojani M. Prognostic significance of breast cancer axillary lymph, node micrometastases assessed by two special techniques: reevaluation with longer follow-up.Br J Cancer 1992;66:523–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group. Prognostic importance of occult axillary lymph node micrometastases from breast cancers.Lancet 1990;335:1565–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Trojani M, deMascarel I, Bonichon F, et al. Micrometastases to axillary lymph nodes from invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: detection by immunohistochemistry and prognostic significance.Br J Cancer 1987;56:838–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sedmak DD, Meineke TA, Knechtges DS. Detection of metastatic breast carcinoma with monoclonal antibodies to cytokeratins.Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989;113:786–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen ZL, Wen DR, Coulson WF, Giuliano AE, Cochran AJ. Occult metastases in axillary lymph nodes of patients with breast cancer node negative by clinical and histologic examination and conventional histology.Dis Markers 1991;9:239–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nasser IA, Lee AK, Bosari S, et al. Occult axillary lymph node metastases in “node negative” breast carcinoma.Hum Pathol 1993;24:950–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. From the Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Cancer Research Center, John L. McClellan Veteran's Administration Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas

    Isabel T. Rubio MD, Maureen Colvert RNP & V. Suzanne Klimberg MD

  2. the Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Cancer Research Center, John L. McClellan Veteran's Administration Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas

    Soheila Korourian MD & V. Suzanne Klimberg MD

  3. the Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Cancer Research Center, John L. McClellan Veteran's Administration Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas

    Christopher Cowan MD

  4. the Department of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont

    David N. Krag MD

Authors
  1. Isabel T. Rubio MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Soheila Korourian MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christopher Cowan MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David N. Krag MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maureen Colvert RNP
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. V. Suzanne Klimberg MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rubio, I.T., Korourian, S., Cowan, C. et al. Use of touch preps for intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 5, 689–694 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303478

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303478

Key Words

Search

Navigation