Skip to main content
Log in

Serial sectioning of sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer: A pilot study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Recent reports indicate that the sentinel node, defined as the first regional lymph node to receive lymphatic fluid from the breast, accurately represents the metastatic status of the primary breast cancer. However, routine single section examination of the regional nodes, including the sentinel node, underestimates the true incidence of metastases. The goal of this study is to determine whether multiple sectioning of sentinel nodes will detect occult metastases in operable breast cancer.

Methods: Nineteen patients with invasive breast cancers were injected with technetium-99m sulfur colloid solution around the tumor or at the biopsy site before lumpectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or mastectomy. The labeled sentinel lymph nodes (SLND) were bivalved, and a central section was taken for hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) examination. The sentinel nodes of 13 patients, which were reported to be negative for metastases, were serially sectioned at 0.5-mm intervals and stained with H & E and a cytokeratin stain, CAM 5.2.

Results: In the 13 node-negative patients, occult metastases were found in the sentinel nodes of 3 patients (23%). Two were seen on H & E and one by cytokeratin stain. The mean numbers of SLND and ALND in this series were 2.6 and 12.5, respectively, and the average number of sections for the two groups was 14 and 1, respectively.

Conclusion: Multiple sectioning of the sentinel node or nodes detects occult metastases and changes the staging of breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cady B, Stone MD, Wayne J. New therapeutic possibilities in primary invasive breast cancer.Ann Surg 1993;218:338–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dowlatshahi K, Snider HC, Kim R. Axillary node status in non-palpable breast cancer.Ann Surg Oncol 1995;2:424–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Silverstein MJ, Gierson ED, Waisman JR, Senofsky GM, Colburn WJ, Gamagami P. Axillary lymph node dissection for T1a breast carcinoma.Cancer 1994;73:664–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cady B. The need to reexamine axillary lymph node dissection in invasive breast cancer.Cancer 1994;73:505–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saphir O, Amromin GD. Obscure axillary lymph node metastases in carcinoma of the breast.Cancer 1948;1:238–41.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pickren JW. Significance of occult metastases. A study of breast cancer.Cancer 1961;14:1266–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer ER, Swamidoss S, Lee CH, Rockette H, Redmond C, Fisher B. Detection and significance of occult axillary node metastases in patients with invasive breast cancer.Cancer 1978;42:2025–31.

    Google Scholar 

  8. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group. Prognostic importance of occult axillary lymph node metastases from breast cancers.Lancet 1990;335:1565–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krag DN, Weaver D, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe.Surg Oncol 1993;2:335–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giuliano AE, Dale P, Turner RR, Morton DL, Evans SW, Krasne DL. Improved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomy.Ann Surg 1995;222:394–401.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Albertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox C, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer.JAMA 1996;276:1818–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Giuliano AE, Jones RC, Brennan M, Statman R. Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer.J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2345–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-node.Lancet 1997;349:1864–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dowlatshahi K, Fan M, Rayudu GV, Krag D, Sherkeirloo M, Bloom K. Diagnostic value of axillary sentinel node in operative breast cancer-work in progress.Breast Journal 1996;2:26.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher B, Redmond C, Fisher ER. The contribution of recent NS-ABP clinical trials of primary breast cancer therapy to an understanding of tumor biology—an overview of the findings.Cancer 1980;46:1009–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Treatment alert issued for node-negative breast cancer.Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1988;80:550–1.

  17. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic or immune therapy: 133 randomized trials involving 31,000 recurrences and 24,000 deaths among 75,000 women.Lancet 1992;339(8785):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic or immune therapy: 133 randomized trials involving 31,000 recurrences and 24,000 deaths among 75,000 women.Lancet 1992;339(8785):71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fisher B, Dignam J, Mamounas EP, et al. Sequential methotrexate and fluorouracil for the treatment of node-negative breast cancer in patients with estrogen receptor-negative tumors: Eight-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B13 and first of findings from NSABP B-19 comparing methotrexate and fluorouracil with conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil.J Clin Oncol 1996;14:1982–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldhirsch A, Castiglione M, Gelber RD. The International Breast Cancer Study Group. A single perioperative chemotherapy course for node-negative breast cancer: Five year results of trial V.Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1992;11:89–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group. Toxic effects of early adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.Lancet 1983;2(8349):542–4.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wells CA, Heryet A, Brochier J, Gatter KC, Mason DY. The immunohistochemical detection of axillary micrometastases in breast cancer.Br J Cancer 1984;50:193–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bussolati G, Gugliotta P, Morra I, Pietribiasi F, Berardengo E. The immunohistochemical detection of lymph node metastases from infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast.Br J Cancer 1986;54:631–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Trojani M, de Mascarel I, Bonichon F, Coindre JM, Delsol G. Micrometastases to axillary lymph nodes from carcinoma of the breast.Br J Cancer 1987;55:303–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma.Arch Surg 1992;127:392–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.Ann Surg 1994;220:391–401.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jannink, I., Fan, M., Nagy, S. et al. Serial sectioning of sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer: A pilot study. Annals of Surgical Oncology 5, 310–314 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303493

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303493

Key Words

Navigation