Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Colonic Crohn’s disease: value of magnetic resonance colonography for detection and quantification of disease activity

  • Invited Update
  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional colonoscopy combined by histological examination, represents the standard for the evaluation of colorectal pathologies and usually is the first examination for the evaluation of patients with suspected or established diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (CD). However, information provided by colonoscopy is limited to mucosal alterations since the technique is unable to evaluate transmural changes or presence of extraluminal complications such as abscesses or fistula. Technological advances in magnetic resonance (MR) raised expectations on the potential role of this imaging modality for evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract based on the high spatial and tissue resolution as well as lack of ionizing radiation. Available evidence indicates that MR colonography (MRC) can be a useful tool as an alternative or complementary to endoscopy for the detection of activity and assessment of severity in colonic CD. In this article, we review the technical aspects of MRC and the spectrum of findings that provide valuable information for the evaluation of colonic CD. Potential applications and limitations of MRC are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mackalski BA, Bernstein CN. New diagnostic imaging tools for inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2006; 55:733–741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stange EF, Travis SP, Vermeire S, et al. European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: definitions and diagnosis. Gut 2006; 55 Suppl 1:i1–i15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Menees S, Higgins P, Korsnes S, Elta G. Does colonoscopy cause increased ulcerative colitis symptoms? Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007; 13:12–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bodily KD, Fletcher JG, Solem CA, et al. Crohn Disease: mural attenuation and thickness at contrast-enhanced CT Enterography—correlation with endoscopic and histologic findings of inflammation. Radiology 2006; 238:505–516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bru C, Sans M, Defelitto MM, et al. Hydrocolonic sonography for evaluating inflammatory bowel disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:99–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:2277–2284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Desmond AN, O’Regan K, Curran C, et al. Crohn’s disease: factors associated with exposure to high levels of diagnostic radiation. Gut 2008; 57:1524–1529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodriguez Gomez S, Pages Llinas M, Castells Garangou A, et al. Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:1396–1405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rimola J, Rodríguez S, García-Bosch O, et al. (2009) Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in Crohn disease. Gut (e-pub)

  10. Albert JG, Martiny F, Krummenerl A, et al. Diagnosis of small bowel Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and fluoroscopic enteroclysis. Gut 2005; 54:1721–1727.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gourtsoyiannis NC, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G, et al. Imaging of small intestinal Crohn’s disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:1915–1925.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tillack C, Seiderer J, Brand S, et al. Correlation of magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) and wireless capsule endoscopy (CE) in the diagnosis of small bowel lesions in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008; 14:1219–1228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dinter DJ, Chakraborty A, Brade J, et al. Endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Crohn’s disease: a retrospective single-centre comparative study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008; 43:207–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Langhorst J, Kuhle CA, Ajaj W, et al. MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of inflammatory bowel diseases: diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007; 13:1001–1008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Florie J, Birnie E, van Gelder RE, et al. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy. Radiology 2007; 245:150–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lauenstein T, Holtmann G, Schoenfelder D, et al. MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:823–827.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, Holtmann G, Debatin JF. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2002; 223:248–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rimola J, Rodríguez S, García-Bosch O, et al. (2009) Role of 3.0-T MR colonography in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease. Radiographics 29:701–719

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schreyer AG, Scheibl K, Heiss P, et al. MR colonography in inflammatory bowel disease. Abdom Imaging 2006; 31:302–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ajaj WM, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity. Gut 2005; 54:257–263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, et al. Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 1997; 349:1288–1291.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. (2001) MR enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease. Radiographics 21: Spec No:S161–172

    Google Scholar 

  23. Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA, et al. Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 2002; 222:652–660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Allez M, Lemann M, Bonnet J, et al. Long term outcome of patients with active Crohn’s disease exhibiting extensive and deep ulcerations at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97:947–953.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut 2005; 54:250–256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin DR, Lauenstein T, Sitaraman SV. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in small bowel Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2007; 133:385–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chiorean MV, Sandrasegaran K, Saxena R, et al. Correlation of CT enteroclysis with surgical pathology in Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:2541–2550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Furukawa A, Saotome T, Yamasaki M, et al. Cross-sectional imaging in Crohn disease. Radiographics 2004; 24:689–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bruining DH, Siddiki HA, Fletcher JG, et al. Prevalence of penetrating disease and extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn’s disease detected with CT enterography. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008; 14:1701–1706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, et al. Adalimumab for maintenance of clinical response and remission in patients with Crohn’s disease: the CHARM trial. Gastroenterology 2007; 132:52–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Travis SP, Stange EF, Lemann M, et al. European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: current management. Gut 2006; 55 Suppl 1:i16–i35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Narin B, Ajaj W, Gohde S, et al. Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn’s disease: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2004; 14:1535–1542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schreyer AG, Golder S, Scheibl K, et al. Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with MRI colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn’s disease: first clinical experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2005; 11:388–394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, CIBER-EHD, IDIBAPS, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain

    Jordi Rimola & Sonia Rodríguez

  2. Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, CIBER-EHD, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain

    Ingrid Ordás & Julián Panés

Authors
  1. Jordi Rimola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ingrid Ordás
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sonia Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julián Panés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Rimola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rimola, J., Ordás, I., Rodríguez, S. et al. Colonic Crohn’s disease: value of magnetic resonance colonography for detection and quantification of disease activity. Abdom Imaging 35, 422–427 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9545-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9545-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation