Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Overall and KRAS-specific results of combined cetuximab treatment and chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study compared the efficacy and toxicities of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The influence of KRAS mutation status on the outcomes was also investigated.

Methods

Literature retrieval, trials selection and assessment, data collection, and statistical analysis were performed according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.0.2. The outcome measures were tumor response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse effects.

Results

Four randomized controlled trials, comprising totally 2,912 patients, were included. Meta-analysis showed higher response rate (RR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.14–3.26) and significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS; HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67–0.95) in cetuximab-chemotherapy groups versus chemotherapy groups. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups regarding overall survival (OS; HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.87–1.05). In wild-type KRAS patients, treatment with cetuximab plus chemotherapy significantly increased response rate (RR 1.44; 95% CI, 1.20–1.73) and improved PFS (HR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50–0.84), as compared with chemotherapy groups, but not for OS (HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.64–1.11). In mutant KRAS patients, there was no significant difference between those treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy and those with chemotherapy alone regarding response rate (RR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.61–1.08), PFS (HR 1.37; 95% CI, 0.81–2.31), and OS (HR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.74–1.44). The risk of grade 3/4 rash, diarrhea, neutropenia, and fatigue was significantly increased in cetuximab combination groups as compared with chemotherapy groups.

Conclusions

The use of cetuximab in addition to chemotherapy was a valid alternative for patients with mCRC. Benefit of cetuximab was only limited to patients with wild-type KRAS tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engstrom PF, Arnoletti JP, Benson AB 3rd, Chen YJ, Choti MA, Cooper HS, Covey A, Dilawari RA, Early DS, Enzinger PC, et al (2009) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Colon Cancer V.2.2009. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Inc, Washington

  2. American Cancer Society (2009) Cancer facts and figures. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@nho/documents/document/500809webpdf.pdf. Accessed Oct 2010

  3. Meyerhardt JA, Mayer RJ (2005) Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 352:476–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Golfinopoulos V, Salanti G, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JP (2007) Survival and disease-progression benefits with treatment regimens for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 8:898–911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Claire K, Jin C (2007) Chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol 16:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peeters M, Price T, Laetem JLV (2009) Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: where are we today? Oncologist 14:29–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baselga J, Arteaga CL (2005) Critical update and emerging trends in epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:2445–2459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR, Makhson A, D’Haens G, Pintér T, Lim R, Bodoky G et al (2009) Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 360:1408–1417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. US Food and Drug Administration (2004) ERBITUX® (cetuximab) Solution for intravenous infusion. Initial US. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/125084s167lbl.pdf. Accessed Sept 2010

  10. Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, Somerfield MR, Hamilton SR, Hammond EH, Hayes DF, McAllister PK, Morton RF, Schilsky RL (2009) American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Oncol 27:2091–2096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. European Medicines Agency (2010) Summary of product characteristics—Erbitux. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000558/WC500029119.pdf. Accessed Oct 2010

  12. Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A, Hartmann JT, Aparicio J, de Braud F, Donea S, Ludwig H, Schuch G, Stroh C et al (2009) Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:663–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sobrero AF, Maurel J, Fehrenbacher L, Scheithauer W, Abubakr YA, Lutz MP, Vega-Villegas ME, Eng C, Steinhauer EU, Prausova J et al (2008) EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:2311–2319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Borner M, Koeberle D, Von Moos R, Saletti P, Rauch D, Hess V, Trojan A, Helbling D, Pestalozzi B, Caspar C et al (2008) Adding cetuximab to capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research SAKK. Ann Oncol 19:1288–1292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baselga J, Norton L, Masui H, Pandiella A, Coplan K, Miller WH Jr, Mendelsohn J (2008) Antitumor effects of doxorubicin in combination with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:1327–1333

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bruns CJ, Harbison MT, Davis DW, Portera CA, Tsan R, McConkey DJ, Evans DB, Abbruzzese JL, Hicklin DJ, Radinsky R (2000) Epidermal growth factor receptor blockade with C225 plus gemcitabine results in regression of human pancreatic carcinoma growing orthotopically in nude mice by antiangiogenic mechanisms. Clin Cancer Res 6:1936–1948

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Inoue K, Slaton JW, Perrotte P, Davis DW, Bruns CJ, Hicklin DJ, McConkey DJ, Sweeney P, Radinsky R, Dinney CP (2000) Paclitaxel enhances the effects of the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody ImClone C225 in mice with metastatic human bladder transitional cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 6:4874–4884

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schilsky RL (2002) End points in cancer clinical trials and the drug approval process. Clin Cancer Res 8:935–938

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Benvenuti S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, Zanon C, Moroni M, Veronese S, Siena S, Bardelli A (2007) Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancer to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies. Canc Res 67:2643–2648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, Simes RJ, Chalchal H, Shapiro JD, Robitaille S et al (2008) K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 359:1757–1765

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Humblet Y, Hendlisz A, Neyns B, Canon JL, Van Laethem JL, Maurel J, Richardson G et al (2007) Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:1658–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arkenau HT, Arnold D, Cassidy J, Diaz-Rubio E, Douillard JY, Hochster H, Martoni A, Grothey A, Hinke A, Schmiegel W et al (2008) Efficacy of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine of infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26:5910–5917

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, Zalcberg JR, Tu D, Au HJ, Berry SR, Krahn M, Price T, Simes RJ et al (2007) Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 357:2040–2048

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang T, Luo L, Zhou Q, Wu T (2008) Irinotecan versus oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU/LV for advanced colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 8:36–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ocvirk J, Brodowicz T, Wrba F, Ciuleanu TE, Kurteva G, Beslija S, Koza I, Pápai Z, Messinger D, Yilmaz U et al (2010) Cetuximab plus FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer: CECOG trial. World J Gastroenterol 16:3133–3143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Linlin Zhang or Qinghua Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Ma, L. & Zhou, Q. Overall and KRAS-specific results of combined cetuximab treatment and chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 26, 1025–1033 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1197-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1197-5

Keywords

Navigation