Skip to main content
Log in

The combination of serum trefoil factor 3 and pepsinogen testing is a valid non-endoscopic biomarker for predicting the presence of gastric cancer: a new marker for gastric cancer risk

  • Original Article—Alimentary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A valid biomarker for predicting the presence of gastric cancer may contribute to reducing deaths from this disease. Although pepsinogen (PG) testing has been introduced as a predictor, its predictive power is not satisfactory. We examined whether serum trefoil factor (TFF) could be a non-endoscopic predictor of the presence of gastric cancer.

Methods

Gastric cancer patients who underwent preoperative endoscopy were sequentially recruited. Individuals who underwent a thorough medical checkup were enrolled as non-cancer controls. Serum levels of TFF1, TFF2, TFF3, Helicobacter pylori antibody, PG I, and PG II were examined.

Results

We studied 192 gastric cancer patients aged 64.3 ± 9.7 years and 1254 non-cancer controls aged 52.3 ± 12.4 years. In the age/gender-matched analysis (187 cases and 561 controls), significant relationships were demonstrated between gastric cancer presence and TFF3 (P < 0.0001), the PGI/II ratio (P < 0.0001), H. pylori antibody (P = 0.001), TFF1 (P = 0.012), and TFF2 (P = 0.020). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for predicting gastric cancer presence was comparably high for all factors (0.893) and for the combination of TFF3 and the PG test (0.883), but was significantly (P < 0.0001) lower for the PG test alone (0.823). A positive PG test showed a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 82%, whereas a combination of TFF3 and PG testing showed a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 80% in predicting the presence of gastric cancer.

Conclusion

The combination of serum TFF3 and PG testing might be a valid non-endoscopic biomarker for predicting the presence of gastric cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fukao A, Tsubono Y, Tsuji I, Hisamichi S, Sugahara N, Takano A. The evaluation of screening for gastric cancer in Miyagi Prefecture, Japan: a population-based case–control study. Int J Cancer. 1995;60:45–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tashiro A, Sano M, Kinameri K, Fujita K, Takeuchi Y. Comparing mass screening techniques for gastric cancer in Japan. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:4873–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miki K, Ichinose M, Kakei N, Yahagi N, Matsushima M, Tsukada S, et al. The clinical application of the serum pepsinogen I and II levels as a mass screening method for gastric cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1995;362:139–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kitahara F, Kobayashi K, Sato T, Kojima Y, Araki T, Fujino MA, et al. Accuracy of screening for gastric cancer using serum pepsinogen concentrations. Gut. 1999;44:693–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dinis-Ribeiro M, Yamaki G, Miki K, Costa-Pereira A, Matsukawa M, Kurihara M. Meta-analysis on the validity of pepsinogen test for gastric carcinoma, dysplasia or chronic atrophic gastritis screening. J Med Screen. 2004;11:141–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Watabe H, Mitsushima T, Yamaji Y, Okamoto M, Wada R, Kokubo T, et al. Predicting the development of gastric cancer from combining Helicobacter pylori antibodies and serum pepsinogen status: a prospective endoscopic cohort study. Gut. 2005;54:764–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Taupin D, Podolsky DK. Trefoil factors: initiators of mucosal healing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:721–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Perry JK, Kannan N, Grandison PM, Mitchell MD, Lobie PE. Are trefoil factors oncogenic? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2008;19:74–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dhar DK, Wang TC, Tabara H, Tonomoto Y, Maruyama R, Tachibana M, et al. Expression of trefoil factor family members correlates with patient prognosis and neoangiogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:6472–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nomura S, Baxter T, Yamaguchi H, Leys C, Vartapetian AB, Fox JG, et al. Spasmolytic polypeptide expressing metaplasia to preneoplasia in H. felis-infected mice. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:582–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peterson AJ, Menheniott TR, O’Connor L, Walduck AK, Fox JG, Kawakami K, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection methylates and silences trefoil factor 2 leading to gastric tumor development in mice and humans. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:2005–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Miki K. Gastric cancer screening using the serum pepsinogen test method. Gastric Cancer. 2006;9:245–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Samloff IM, Varis K, Ihamaki T, Siurala M, Rotter JI. Relationships among serum pepsinogen I, serum pepsinogen II and gastric mucosal histology. A study in relatives of patients with pernicious anemia. Gastroenterology. 1982;83:204–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oishi Y, Kiyohara Y, Kubo M, Tanaka K, Tanizaki Y, Ninomiya T, et al. The serum pepsinogen test as a predictor of gastric cancer: the Hisayama study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:629–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leung WK, Yu J, Chan FK, To KF, Chan MW, Ebert MP, et al. Expression of trefoil peptides (TFF1, TFF2, and TFF3) in gastric carcinomas, intestinal metaplasia, and non-neoplastic gastric tissues. J Pathol. 2002;197:582–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lao-Sirieix P, Boussioutas A, Kadri SR, O’Donovan M, Debiram I, Das M, et al. Non-endoscopic screening biomarkers for Barrett’s oesophagus: from microarray analysis to the clinic. Gut. 2009;58:1451–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bignotti E, Ravaggi A, Tassi RA, Calza S, Rossi E, Falchetti M, et al. Trefoil factor 3: a novel serum marker identified by gene expression profiling in high-grade endometrial carcinomas. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:768–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vestergaard EM, Borre M, Poulsen SS, Nexø E, Tørring N. Plasma levels of trefoil factors are increased in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12(3 Pt 1):807–12.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vestergaard EM, Nexø E, Tørring N, Borre M, Ørntoft TF, Sørensen KD. Promoter hypomethylation and upregulation of trefoil factors in prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:1857–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Morson BC, Dawson IMP, Day DW, Jass JR, Price AB, Williams GT, et al. Malignant epithelial tumours. In: Morson and Dawson, editors. Gastrointestinal pathology. 3rd ed. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1990. p. 143–69.

  22. He XX, Yang J, Ding YW, Liu W, Shen QY, Xia HH. Increased epithelial and serum expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in gastric cancer: potential role of MIF in gastric carcinogenesis. Gut. 2006;55:797–802.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ms. Keiko Hayakawa for her helpful assistance.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuru Kaise.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaise, M., Miwa, J., Tashiro, J. et al. The combination of serum trefoil factor 3 and pepsinogen testing is a valid non-endoscopic biomarker for predicting the presence of gastric cancer: a new marker for gastric cancer risk. J Gastroenterol 46, 736–745 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-011-0396-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-011-0396-8

Keywords

Navigation