Abstract
Background
Advances in understanding the molecular basis of breast cancer has necessitated a definition of improved indicators of prognosis that are central to the underlying cancer biology and that reflect the heterogeneous nature of the disease. This study investigates the pattern of expression of the steroid receptor co-regulators NCOA1/SRC1, NCOA3/RAC3, NCOR2/SMRT, and CBP/p300 in breast cancer. The aims were to identify whether their expression was related to patient outcome, their relationships to known prognostic factors and to provide a basis for further research into the mechanistic significance of such associations.
Methods
The protein levels of steroid receptor co-regulators were assessed by immunohistochemistry in a large well-characterised series of breast carcinomas prepared as tissue microarrays. Relationships between these targets, other clinicopathological variables and patients’ outcome were examined.
Results
NCOR2/SMRT was an independent prognostic indicator of overall patient survival (OS) and disease free interval (DFI) and was significantly correlated with distant metastases and local recurrence whereas tumours expressing NCOA1/SRC1 had a significantly longer OS and DFI. There were also significant correlations between co-regulator expression of NCOA1/SRC1, CBP/p300 and NCOA3/RAC3, which were associated with lower tumour grade. NCOA1/SRC1 was also correlated with smaller tumour size. Furthermore, the co-activators had a significant association with steroid receptors, particularly ERα.
Conclusions
NCOR2/SMRT is associated with poor patient outcome, independent of other prognostic factors. In contrast, steroid receptor co-activator expression is generally associated with a good prognosis. Further investigations are needed to establish the mechanisms of these links between the steroid receptor co-regulator system and patient outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lonning PE, Borresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752
Beckmann MW, Niederacher D, Schnurch HG, Gusterson BA, Bender HG (1997) Multistep carcinogenesis of breast cancer and tumour heterogeneity. J Mol Med 75:429–439
Cordera F, Jordan VC (2006) Steroid receptors and their role in the biology and control of breast cancer growth. Semin Oncol 33:631–641
Madjd Z, Pinder SE, Paish C, Ellis IO, Carmichael J, Durrant LG (2003) Loss of CD59 expression in breast tumours correlates with poor survival. J Pathol 200:633–639
Schippinger W, Regitnig P, Dandachi N, Wernecke KD, Bauernhofer T, Samonigg H, Moinfar F (2006) Evaluation of the prognostic significance of androgen receptor expression in metastatic breast cancer. Virchows Arch 449:24–30
Gao X, Loggie BW, Nawaz Z (2002) The roles of sex steroid receptor coregulators in cancer. Mol Cancer 1:7
Bouras T, Southey MC, Venter DJ (2001) Overexpression of the steroid receptor coactivator AIB1 in breast cancer correlates with the absence of estrogen and progesterone receptors and positivity for p53 and HER2/neu. Cancer Res 61:903–907
Pao GM, Janknecht R, Ruffner H, Hunter T, Verma IM (2000) CBP/p300 interact with and function as transcriptional coactivators of BRCA1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:1020–1025
Kurebayashi J, Otsuki T, Kunisue H, Tanaka K, Yamamoto S, Sonoo H (2000) Expression levels of estrogen receptor-alpha, estrogen receptor-beta, coactivators, and corepressors in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 6:512–518
Fleming FJ, Hill AD, McDermott EW, O’Higgins NJ, Young LS (2004) Differential recruitment of coregulator proteins steroid receptor coactivator-1 and silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid receptors to the estrogen receptor-estrogen response element by beta-estradiol and 4-hydroxytamoxifen in human breast cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:375–383
Myers E, Hill AD, Kelly G, McDermott EW, O’Higgins NJ, Buggy Y, Young LS (2005) Associations and interactions between Ets-1 and Ets-2 and coregulatory proteins, SRC-1, AIB1, and NCoR in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11:2111–2122
Fleming FJ, Myers E, Kelly G, Crotty TB, McDermott EW, O’Higgins NJ, Hill AD, Young LS (2004) Expression of SRC-1, AIB1, and PEA3 in HER2 mediated endocrine resistant breast cancer; a predictive role for SRC-1. J Clin Pathol 57:1069–1074
Myers E, Fleming FJ, Crotty TB, Kelly G, McDermott EW, O’Higgins NJ, Hill AD, Young LS (2004) Inverse relationship between ER-beta and SRC-1 predicts outcome in endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Br J Cancer 91:1687–1693
Iwase H, Zhang Z, Omoto Y, Sugiura H, Yamashita H, Toyama T, Iwata H, Kobayashi S (2003) Clinical significance of the expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta for endocrine therapy of breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 52(Suppl 1):S34–38
Hudelist G, Czerwenka K, Kubista E, Marton E, Pischinger K, Singer CF (2003) Expression of sex steroid receptors and their co-factors in normal and malignant breast tissue: AIB1 is a carcinoma-specific co-activator. Breast Cancer Res Treat 78:193–204
List HJ, Reiter R, Singh B, Wellstein A, Riegel AT (2001) Expression of the nuclear coactivator AIB1 in normal and malignant breast tissue. Breast Cancer Res Treat 68:21–28
Fuqua SA, Schiff R, Parra I, Moore JT, Mohsin SK, Osborne CK, Clark GM, Allred DC (2003) Estrogen receptor beta protein in human breast cancer: correlation with clinical tumour parameters. Cancer Res 63:2434–2439
Girault I, Lerebours F, Amarir S, Tozlu S, Tubiana-Hulin M, Lidereau R, Bieche I (2003) Expression analysis of estrogen receptor alpha coregulators in breast carcinoma: evidence that NCOR1 expression is predictive of the response to tamoxifen. Clin Cancer Res 9:1259–1266
Torchia J, Rose DW, Inostroza J, Kamei Y, Westin S, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG (1997) The transcriptional co-activator p/CIP binds CBP and mediates nuclear-receptor function. Nature 387:677–684
Dobrzycka KM, Townson SM, Jiang S, Oesterreich S (2003) Estrogen receptor corepressors–a role in human breast cancer? Endocr Relat Cancer 10:517–536
Ellis IO, Galea M, Broughton N, Locker A, Blamey RW, Elston CW (1992) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 20:479–489
Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410
Galea MH, Blamey RW, Elston CE, Ellis IO (1992) The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 22:207–219
Abd El-Rehim DM, Ball G, Pinder SE, Rakha EA, Paish C, Robertson JFR, MacMillan D, Blamey RW, Ellis IO (2005) High throughput protein expression analysis using Tissue Microarray Technology of a large well characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses. Int J Cancer 116:340–350
Abd El-Rehim DM, Pinder SE, Paish CE, Bell JA, Rampaul RS, Blamey RW, Robertson JF, Nicholson RI, Ellis IO (2004) Expression and co-expression of the members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family in invasive breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer 91:1532–1542
Rakha EA, El-Rehim DA, Paish C, Green AR, Lee AH, Robertson JF, Blamey RW, Macmillan D, Ellis IO (2006) Basal phenotype identifies a poor prognostic subgroup of breast cancer of clinical importance. Eur J Cancer 42:3149–3156
Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, Lee AH, Robertson JF, Ellis IO (2007) Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer 109:25–32
McCarty KS Jr, Miller LS, Cox EB, Konrath J, McCarty KS Sr (1985) Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 109:716–721
Hoos A, Urist MJ, Stojadinovic A, Mastorides S, Dudas ME, Leung DH, Kuo D, Brennan MF, Lewis JJ, Cordon-Cardo C (2001) Validation of tissue microarrays for immunohistochemical profiling of cancer specimens using the example of human fibroblastic tumours. Am J Pathol 158:1245–1251
Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Kallioniemi A, Barlund M, Schraml P, Leighton S, Torhorst J, Mihatsch MJ, Sauter G, Kallioniemi OP (1998) Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens. Nat Med 4:844–847
Chen Y, Chen CF, Riley DJ, Allred DC, Chen PL, Von Hoff D, Osborne CK, Lee WH (1995) Aberrant subcellular localization of BRCA1 in breast cancer. Science 270:789–791
Torchia J, Glass C, Rosenfeld MG (1998) Co-activators and co-repressors in the integration of transcriptional responses. Curr Opin Cell Biol 10:373–383
Font de Mora J, Brown M (2000) AIB1 is a conduit for kinase-mediated growth factor signaling to the estrogen receptor. Mol Cell Biol 20:5041–5047
Smith CL, Onate SA, Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW (1996) CREB binding protein acts synergistically with steroid receptor coactivator-1 to enhance steroid receptor-dependent transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:8884–8888
Pusztai L, Ayers M, Stec J, Clark E, Hess K, Stivers D, Damokosh A, Sneige N, Buchholz TA, Esteva FJ, Arun B, Cristofanilli M, Booser D, Rosales M, Valero V, Adams C, Hortobagyi GN, Symmans WF (2003) Gene expression profiles obtained from fine-needle aspirations of breast cancer reliably identify routine prognostic markers and reveal large-scale molecular differences between estrogen-negative and estrogen-positive tumours. Clin Cancer Res 9:2406–2415
Fan S, Ma YX, Wang C, Yuan RQ, Meng Q, Wang JA, Erdos M, Goldberg ID, Webb P, Kushner PJ, Pestell RG, Rosen EM (2002) p300 modulates the BRCA1 inhibition of estrogen receptor activity. Cancer Res 62:141–151
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Breast Cancer Campaign.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Green, A.R., Burney, C., Granger, C.J. et al. The prognostic significance of steroid receptor co-regulators in breast cancer: co-repressor NCOR2/SMRT is an independent indicator of poor outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 110, 427–437 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9737-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9737-y