Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Medulloblastoma

  • NEURO-ONCOLOGY (NEUROPLASMS) (M ROSENFELD, SECTION EDITOR)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

The mainstay of medulloblastoma treatment is high-quality interdisciplinary collaboration in diagnosis, treatment, and aftercare by all involved disciplines. The first step in treatment of medulloblastoma is a maximal safe surgery, followed by thorough staging. Surgery should only be performed in experienced neurosurgical centers, with age-appropriate postoperative care. As optimal risk stratification is based on histopathological and neuroradiological assessments, these should be performed or confirmed by experienced specialists. Central review of histopathological subtype, as well as review of staging evaluations is highly desirable. For young children with desmoplastic/nodular (DMB), or extensive nodular medulloblastoma, craniospinal or any radiotherapy should be avoided. For young children with classic medulloblastoma (CMB), large cell, or anaplastic medulloblastoma (LC/A MB) optimized strategies with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue with or without local radiotherapy are under investigation. For older clinical standard risk patients (without metastases, without postoperative residual tumor >1.5 cm2) with CMB or DMB, craniospinal radiotherapy with 23.4 Gy and boost to the posterior fossa to 54 Gy, followed by maintenance chemotherapy can be regarded as a standard therapy besides other currently applied regimen, such as the use of intensified chemotherapy after irradiation. Older children with LC/A MB, metastatic medulloblastoma, and/or large residual tumor can be regarded as high-risk patients and should receive intensified treatment: intensified chemotherapeutic regimen before or after radiotherapy with increased dose (36-Gy CSI normofractionated, or 40-Gy hyperfractionated) is used. For treatment to be effective, quality control of radiotherapy is of high relevance. Information on long-term sequelae is essential and appropriate multidisciplinary follow-up and support, including rehabilitation and help for reintegration, is necessary. Whenever possible, patients should be included in prospective studies, and tumor material should be sampled to facilitate further research on medulloblastoma biology, which will significantly influence the stratification criteria and the introduction of targeted therapies in standard treatment recommendations in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Kaatsch P, Rickert CH, Kuhl J, et al. Population-based epidemiologic data on brain tumors in German children. Cancer. 2001;92(12):3155–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tait DM, Thornton-Jones H, Bloom HJ, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for medulloblastoma: the first multi-centre control trial of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP I). Eur J Cancer. 1990;26(4):464–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans AE, Jenkin RD, Sposto R, et al. The treatment of medulloblastoma. Results of a prospective randomized trial of radiation therapy with and without CCNU, vincristine, and prednisone. J Neurosurg. 1990;72(4):572–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey CC, Gnekow A, Wellek S, et al. Prospective randomised trial of chemotherapy given before radiotherapy in childhood medulloblastoma. International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) and the (German) Society of Paediatric Oncology (GPO): SIOP II. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1995;25(3):166–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler O, et al., editors. WHO Classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Lyon: IARC; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rutkowski S, von Hoff K, Emser A, et al. Survival and prognostic factors of early childhood medulloblastoma: an international meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2010:28(33):4961–4968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown HG, Kepner JL, Perlman EJ, et al. “Large cell/anaplastic” medulloblastomas: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2000;59(10):857–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Giangaspero F, Wellek S, Masuoka J, et al. Stratification of medulloblastoma on the basis of histopathological grading. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2006;112(1):5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor MD, Northcott PA, Korshunov A, et al. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol 2012:123(4):465–472.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson MC, Fuller C, Hogg TL, et al. Genomics identifies medulloblastoma subgroups that are enriched for specific genetic alterations. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(12):1924–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kool M, Koster J, Bunt J, et al. Integrated genomics identifies five medulloblastoma subtypes with distinct genetic profiles, pathway signatures and clinicopathological features. PLoS One. 2008;3(8):e3088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Northcott PA, Korshunov A, Witt H, et al. Medulloblastoma comprises four distinct molecular variants. J Clin Oncol. 2010;29(11):1408–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rausch T, Jones DT, Zapatka M, et al. Genome sequencing of pediatric medulloblastoma links catastrophic DNA rearrangements with TP53 mutations. Cell. 2012;148(1–2):59–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Monje M, Beachy PA, Fisher PG. Hedgehogs, flies, Wnts and MYCs: the time has come for many things in medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(11):1395–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wells EM, Khademian ZP, Walsh KS, et al. Postoperative cerebellar mutism syndrome following treatment of medulloblastoma: neuroradiographic features and origin. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010;5(4):329–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gudrunardottir T, Sehested A, Juhler M, et al. Cerebellar mutism: review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 2011:27(3):355–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Robertson PL, Muraszko KM, Holmes EJ, et al. Incidence and severity of postoperative cerebellar mutism syndrome in children with medulloblastoma: a prospective study by the Children’s Oncology Group. J Neurosurg. 2006;105(6 Suppl):444–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garre ML, Cama A, Bagnasco F, et al. Medulloblastoma variants: age-dependent occurrence and relation to Gorlin syndrome–a new clinical perspective. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(7):2463–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhatia R, Tahir M, Chandler CL. The management of hydrocephalus in children with posterior fossa tumours: the role of pre-resectional endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2009;45(3):186–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Di Rocco F, Jucá CE, Zerah M, et al., Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and posterior fossa tumors. World Neurosurg. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.02.018.

  21. Due-Tonnessen BJ, Helseth E. Management of hydrocephalus in children with posterior fossa tumors: role of tumor surgery. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2007;43(2):92–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Riva-Cambrin J, Detsky AS, Lamberti-Pasculli M, et al. Predicting postresection hydrocephalus in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;3(5):378–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Duffner PK, Horowitz ME, Krischer JP, et al. Postoperative chemotherapy and delayed radiation in children less than three years of age with malignant brain tumors. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(24):1725–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rutkowski S, Gerber NU, von Hoff K, et al. Treatment of early childhood medulloblastoma by postoperative chemotherapy and deferred radiotherapy. Neuro Oncol. 2009;11(2):201–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rutkowski S, Bode U, Deinlein F, et al. Treatment of early childhood medulloblastoma by postoperative chemotherapy alone. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):978–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Geyer JR, Sposto R, Jennings M, et al. Multiagent chemotherapy and deferred radiotherapy in infants with malignant brain tumors: a report from the Children’s Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(30):7621–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Grill J, Sainte-Rose C, Jouvet A, et al. Treatment of medulloblastoma with postoperative chemotherapy alone: an SFOP prospective trial in young children. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(8):573–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Grundy RG, Wilne SH, Robinson KJ, et al. Primary postoperative chemotherapy without radiotherapy for treatment of brain tumours other than ependymoma in children under 3 years: results of the first UKCCSG/SIOP CNS 9204 trial. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(1):120–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dhall G, Grodman H, Sands S, et al. Outcome of children less than three years old at diagnosis with non-metastatic medulloblastoma treated with chemotherapy on the “Head Start” I and II protocols. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;50(6):1169–75.

    Google Scholar 

  30. von Bueren AO, von Hoff K, Pietsch T, et al. Treatment of young children with localized medulloblastoma by chemotherapy alone: results of the prospective, multicenter trial HIT 2000 confirming the prognostic impact of histology. Neuro Oncol. 2011;13(6):669–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Leary SE, Zhou T, Holmes E, et al. Histology predicts a favorable outcome in young children with desmo-plastic medulloblastoma: a report from the children’s oncology group. Cancer. 2011;117(14):3262–3267.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM, Finlay JL, et al. Metastasis stage, adjuvant treatment, and residual tumor are prognostic factors for medulloblastoma in children: conclusions from the Children’s Cancer Group 921 randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(3):832–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lannering B, Rutkowski S, doz F, et al. HIT-SIOP PNET4 - A randomised multicentre study of hyperfractionated (HFRT) versus standard radiotherapy (STRT) in children with standard risk medulloblastoma. Neuro-Oncol. 2010;6(12):ii5 (abstr). This prospective, randomized trial compared the use of conventional and hyperfractionated radiotherapy for treatment of standard risk medulloblastoma patients. Clinical risk factors were analyzed.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Warmuth-Metz M, Bison B, Leykamm S. Neuroradiologic review in pediatric brain tumor studies. Klin Neuroradiol. 2009;19(4):263–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Knauth M, Aras N, Wirtz CR, et al. Surgically induced intracranial contrast enhancement: potential source of diagnostic error in intraoperative MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20(8):1547–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chang CH, Housepian EM, Herbert Jr C. An operative staging system and a megavoltage radiotherapeutic technic for cerebellar medulloblastomas. Radiology. 1969;93(6):1351–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gajjar A, Chintagumpala M, Ashley D, et al. Risk-adapted craniospinal radiotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue in children with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma (St Jude Medulloblastoma-96): long-term results from a prospective, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(10):813–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. von Hoff K, Hinkes B, Gerber NU, et al. Long-term outcome and clinical prognostic factors in children with medulloblastoma treated in the prospective randomised multicentre trial HIT’91. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(7):1209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Verlooy J, Mosseri V, Bracard S, et al. Treatment of high risk medulloblastomas in children above the age of 3 years: a SFOP study. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(17):3004–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Warmuth-Metz M, Kuhl J, Krauss J, et al. Subdural enhancement on postoperative spinal MRI after resection of posterior cranial fossa tumours. Neuroradiology. 2004;46(3):219–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Northcott PA, Hielscher T, Dubuc A, et al. Pediatric and adult sonic hedgehog medulloblastomas are clinically and molecularly distinct. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;122(2):231–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. von Hoff K, Hartmann W, von Bueren AO, et al. Large cell/anaplastic medulloblastoma: outcome according to myc status, histopathological, and clinical risk factors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;54(3):369–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Eberhart CG, Kratz J, Wang Y, et al. Histopathological and molecular prognostic markers in medulloblastoma: c-myc, N-myc, TrkC, and anaplasia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2004;63(5):441–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ryan SL, Schwalbe EC, Cole M, et al. MYC family amplification and clinical risk-factors interact to predict an extremely poor prognosis in childhood medulloblastoma. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123(4):501–513.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Packer RJ, Gajjar A, Vezina G, et al. Phase III study of craniospinal radiation therapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed average-risk medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(25):4202–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Merchant TE, Kun LE, Krasin MJ, et al. Multi-institution prospective trial of reduced-dose craniospinal irradiation (23.4 Gy) followed by conformal posterior fossa (36 Gy) and primary site irradiation (55.8 Gy) and dose-intensive chemotherapy for average-risk medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(3):782–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gandola L, Massimino M, Cefalo G, et al. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in the Milan strategy for metastatic medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(4):566–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mulhern RK, Palmer SL, Merchant TE, et al. Neurocognitive consequences of risk-adapted therapy for childhood medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5511–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Grill J, Renaux VK, Bulteau C, et al. Long-term intellectual outcome in children with posterior fossa tumors according to radiation doses and volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45(1):137–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Carrie C, Hoffstetter S, Gomez F, et al. Impact of targeting deviations on outcome in medulloblastoma: study of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology (SFOP). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45(2):435–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Oyharcabal-Bourden V, Kalifa C, Gentet JC, et al. Standard-risk medulloblastoma treated by adjuvant chemotherapy followed by reduced-dose craniospinal radiation therapy: a French Society of Pediatric Oncology Study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(21):4726–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Carrie C, Grill J, Figarella-Branger D, et al. Online quality control, hyperfractionated radiotherapy alone and reduced boost volume for standard risk medulloblastoma: long-term results of MSFOP 98. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(11):1879–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Packer RJ, Goldwein J, Nicholson HS, et al. Treatment of children with medulloblastomas with reduced-dose craniospinal radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy: A Children’s Cancer Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(7):2127–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Duffner PK. Risk factors for cognitive decline in children treated for brain tumors. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010;14(2):106–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Palmer SL. Neurodevelopmental impact on children treated for medulloblastoma: a review and proposed conceptual model. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2008;14(3):203–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Butler RW, Sahler OJ, Askins MA, et al. Interventions to improve neuropsychological functioning in childhood cancer survivors. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2008;14(3):251–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Frange P, Alapetite C, G Gaboriaud, et al. From childhood to adulthood: long-term outcome of medulloblastoma patients. The Institut Curie experience (1980–2000). J Neurooncol. 2009;95(2):271–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Puget S, Boddaert N, Viguier D, et al. Injuries to inferior vermis and dentate nuclei predict poor neurological and neuropsychological outcome in children with malignant posterior fossa tumors. Cancer. 2009;115(6):1338–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ribi K, Relly C, Landolt MA, et al. Outcome of medulloblastoma in children: long-term complications and quality of life. Neuropediatrics. 2005;36(6):357–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Kortmann RD, Kuhl J, Timmermann B, et al. Postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy as compared to immediate radiotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in the treatment of medulloblastoma in childhood: results of the German prospective randomized trial HIT ’91. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;46(2):269–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Packer RJ, Boyett JM, Janss AJ, et al. Growth hormone replacement therapy in children with medulloblastoma: use and effect on tumor control. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(2):480–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Goldstein AM, Yuen J, Tucker MA. Second cancers after medulloblastoma: population-based results from the United States and Sweden. Cancer Causes Control. 1997;8(6):865–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Dr. Rutkowski has received grant support from the German Childhood Cancer Foundation.

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

    Katja von Hoff MD & Stefan Rutkowski MD

Authors
  1. Katja von Hoff MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Rutkowski MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Rutkowski MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von Hoff, K., Rutkowski, S. Medulloblastoma. Curr Treat Options Neurol 14, 416–426 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-012-0183-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-012-0183-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation